Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
Frequent lineage-specific substitution rate changes support an episodic model for protein evolution
1Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306 Plön, Germany.
Abstract:
Since the inception of the molecular clock model for sequence evolution, the investigation of protein divergence has revolved around the question of a more or less constant change of amino acid sequences, with specific overall rates for each family. Although anomalies in clock-like divergence are well known, the assumption of a constant decay rate for a given protein family is usually taken as the null model for protein evolution. However, systematic tests of this null model at a genome-wide scale have lagged behind, despite the databases' enormous growth. We focus here on divergence rate comparisons between very closely related lineages since this allows clear orthology assignments by synteny and reliable alignments, which are crucial for determining substitution rate changes. We generated a high-confidence dataset of syntenic orthologs from four ape species, including humans. We find that despite the appearance of an overall clock-like substitution pattern, several hundred protein families show lineage-specific acceleration and deceleration in divergence rates, or combinations of both in different lineages. Hence, our analysis uncovers a rather dynamic history of substitution rate changes, even between these closely related lineages, implying that one should expect that a large fraction of proteins will have had a history of episodic rate changes in deeper phylogenies. Furthermore, each of the lineages has a separate set of particularly fast diverging proteins. The genes with the highest percentage of branch-specific substitutions are ADCYAP1 in the human lineage (9.7%), CALU in chimpanzees (7.1%), SLC39A14 in the internal branch leading to humans and chimpanzees (4.1%), RNF128 in gorillas (9%), and S100Z in gibbons (15.2%). The mutational pattern in ADCYAP1 suggests a biased mutation process, possibly through asymmetric gene conversion effects. We conclude that a null model of constant change can be problematic for predicting the evolutionary trajectories of individual proteins.
More Related Videos
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Speciation Rates
Gene Duplication and Divergence
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
Exon Recombination
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
The Evidence for Evolution
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...