Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Insights Into Coronary Sinus Reducer Non-Responders
Francesco Ponticelli, Arif A Khokhar, Stefano Albani
1Interventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & Research Maria Cecilia Hospital, Via Madonna di Genova, 1, 48033 Cotignola RA, Italy. giannini_fra@yahoo.it.
Insights
The coronary sinus (CS) reducer helps refractory angina, but 15-30% of patients don't respond. This review explores six key reasons for treatment failure, aiming to improve outcomes for non-responders.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Devices
Background:
- Refractory angina impacts patients with advanced coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction.
- Current treatments offer limited options for this patient group.
- The coronary sinus (CS) reducer is a device implanted in the CS to manage chronic refractory angina.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the mechanisms behind poor response to coronary sinus (CS) reducer therapy.
- To identify factors contributing to treatment failure in patients with refractory angina.
- To highlight areas for improvement to reduce the number of non-responders.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of mechanisms explaining non-response to CS reducer therapy.
- Analysis of factors including patient selection, cardiac venous anatomy, and device-related issues.
- Discussion of coronary artery disease characteristics and myocardial ischemia levels.
Main Results:
- Between 15% and 30% of patients do not respond to CS reducer therapy.
- Six primary mechanisms for non-response are identified: inappropriate patient selection, cardiac venous heterogeneity, CS size, incomplete device endothelialization, coronary artery disease phenotype/progression, and limited baseline myocardial ischemia.
- These factors collectively explain the variability in treatment outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the mechanisms of non-response is crucial for optimizing CS reducer therapy.
- Addressing patient selection, anatomical variations, and device performance can potentially improve outcomes.
- Further research is needed to mitigate the burden of non-responders and enhance quality of life for angina patients.
Background:
Refractory angina affects an increasing proportion of the population with advanced coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction. Limited effective pharmacological and interventional therapies exist for this patient cohort. The coronary sinus (CS) reducer, recently recommended in the 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the management of chronic refractory angina, is a balloon-expandable, stainless-steel device designed for implantation in the CS. It acts by increasing CS pressure, thereby redistributing blood to ischemic myocardium, relieving symptoms, and improving quality of life. However, between 15%-30% of patients do not respond to this treatment. Six mechanisms appear to explain this poor response to CS reducer therapy: (1) inappropriate patient selection; (2) cardiac venous system heterogeneity; (3) CS size; (4) incomplete device endothelialization; (5) coronary artery disease phenotype and progression; and (6) limited myocardial ischemia at baseline. We hereby review these mechanisms in detail and highlight key areas that should be addressed in order to try and reduce the burden of non-responders following CS reducer implantation.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

