Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.3K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.0K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

7.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
7.0K
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

24
Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
24
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

16.3K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
16.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Water calorimetry-based beam quality correction factors for carbon and helium ion beams.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Multi-model study of fast VMAT segment dose calculation with deep learning.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

End-to-end testing of an online adaptive radiotherapy workflow for liver tumors using a dynamic Thoraco-abdominal anthropomorphic phantom.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Electron spin resonance measurements of radiation-induced radicals under conventional and ultra-high dose rate electron irradiation.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

A data analysis framework for<i>in vivo</i>monitoring in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT): towards 3D reconstruction of interfractional anatomical changes.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

A Monte Carlo dose engine for fast neutron therapy and boron neutron capture therapy for matRad.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.9K

Efficient uncertainty quantification for Monte Carlo dose calculations using importance (re-)weighting.

P Stammer1,2,3, L Burigo2,4, O Jäkel2,3,4,5

  • 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Steinbuch Centre for Computing, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|September 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an efficient Monte Carlo (MC) method for quantifying dose uncertainties in proton therapy, significantly reducing computation time. The new approach accurately assesses set-up and range errors, improving treatment safety.

Keywords:
Monte Carloimportance samplingintensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT)proton therapyrange errorsetup erroruncertainty

More Related Videos

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

12.0K
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.9K
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

12.0K
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Computational Physics
  • Radiotherapy Physics

Background:

  • Proton intensity-modulated particle therapy (IMPT) offers high precision but is sensitive to range and set-up uncertainties.
  • Accurate dose calculation using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations is computationally intensive, hindering robust uncertainty quantification.
  • Existing methods for dose uncertainty quantification often rely on sampling error scenarios, which is challenging with complex MC simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an efficient uncertainty quantification method for range and set-up errors in MC dose calculations.
  • To approximate uncertainties from dynamic influences like interplay effects using error correlation models.
  • To reduce the computational burden of dose uncertainty quantification in IMPT.

Main Methods:

  • An importance (re-)weighting method was implemented within MC history scoring.
  • This method concurrently estimates error scenarios, expected dose, and variance from a single simulation set.
  • A multivariate Gaussian input and uncertainty model was utilized, allowing for various correlation models and adjustable accuracy trade-offs.

Main Results:

  • The method was validated using the TOPAS MC code for proton IMPT.
  • High accuracy was achieved for set-up uncertainties (e.g., 99.01% for expected dose, 98.04% for variance).
  • Sufficient agreement was obtained for range uncertainties, with pass rates up to 99.39% (expected dose) and 93.70% (variance), and CPU time decreased by over an order of magnitude.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method provides an efficient and accurate approach for quantifying dose uncertainties in IMPT.
  • It significantly reduces computational time compared to traditional methods.
  • This facilitates the use of high-dimensional uncertainty models, enhancing treatment safety and reliability in proton therapy.