Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
An Examination of General Surgery Residency Programs with a Rural Track
Christopher G Halline1, Nikita Mokhashi2, Felix R De Bie3
1Primary Care and Population Medicine Program, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Background:
There is a steady decline in the general surgery workforce in rural areas of the United States. In response, some surgery residency programs have developed rural tracks to encourage rural practice and adequately prepare trainees for this setting.
Objective:
To compare the practice type and location of graduates from general surgery residency programs with and without a dedicated rural track between 2011-2020.
Methods:
General surgery residency programs with and without a rural track were identified using the American Medical Association Residency and Fellowship Electronic Interactive Database and the Rural Surgery Program list from the American College of Surgeons. Graduates of these programs who entered general surgery practice between 2011-2020 were subsequently identified from individual residency program websites and tracked to their current practice setting using a Google search of first and last name and residency affiliation. Practice location was identified by zip code or county name and coded by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC, Economic Research Service, USDA).
Results:
We identified 2,582 general surgery residency graduates from 2011 to 2020 across 66 residency programs. Of these graduates from programs without a rural track, 23.6% entered general surgery practice without additional fellowship training, compared to 34.0% from residency programs with a rural track (p = 0.019). Community or University-based program designation was not associated with decision to enter general surgery practice over fellowship training (p = 0.420). Proportion of graduates entering rural practice as defined by RUCC groups 7-9 was not associated with having a rural program track or with community or university-based program status.
Conclusion:
Residency programs with a rural track produce a higher proportion of graduates entering general surgery compared to fellowship, though they are no more likely than programs without a rural track to produce graduates who ultimately practice in rural areas.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:25Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....