Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Experience in the use of midclavicular catheters: An inception cohort study
María Aranzazu Tomás-López1, Estíbaliz Cristóbal-Domínguez2, Oiane Báez-Gurruchaga3
1Oncology department nursing supervisor, Bioaraba, Vascular Care Research Group, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Aims And Objectives:
To describe the outcomes of midclavicular catheters related to first insertion success rate, catheter dwell time, rate of catheter survival until the end of the treatment, and complication rates, as well as identify risk factors associated with early catheter removal.
Background:
Midclavicular catheters are peripheral venous catheters that are typically 20-25 cm in length.
Design:
Inception cohort study.
Methods:
We included all the midclavicular lines inserted in patients who met any of the following criteria: (a) difficult venous access; (b) administration of intravenous therapy expected to last between 6 and 30 days with non-irritant (pH=5-9) and/or non-vesicant drugs; or (c) contraindications to central venous catheter placement. The incidence of adverse events was calculated using percentages and episodes per 1,000 catheter days. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant risk factors for unexpected catheter removal by calculating odds ratios. Catheter survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis. The STROBE guidelines were followed.
Results:
Overall, 2,275 midclavicular lines were placed in 1,841 participants. The insertion success rate was 99.4% and the mean catheter dwell time was 21.82 days. The rate of adverse events was .7 per 1,000 catheter days, the most common complications being thrombosis (.39) and catheter-associated bacteraemia (.14). No significant association was found between adverse events and the administration of irritant drugs. The incidence of unexpected removal was 6.7 per 1,000 catheter days. The multivariate analysis showed that both age ≤70 years and home therapy were associated with a lower likelihood of catheter failure.
Conclusions:
Midclavicular catheters are associated with a high rate of insertion success and low rates of adverse events and unplanned removal.
Relevance To Clinical Practice:
Midclavicular lines are a safe alternative for intravenous therapy lasting more than 6 days, even with irritant drugs.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
09:57A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management