Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

07:10
Fluorescent Paper Strips for the Detection of Diesel Adulteration with Smartphone Read-out
Published on: November 9, 2018
9.6K
Smartphone-based handheld Raman spectrometer and machine learning for essential oil quality evaluation.
Leo Lebanov1,2, Brett Paull1,2
1Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. brett.paull@utas.edu.au.
Analytical Methods : Advancing Methods and Applications
|September 23, 2021
Summary
This study introduces a smartphone Raman spectrometer and machine learning to quickly detect adulterated essential oils (EOs). The method accurately identifies and quantifies common adulterants like benzyl alcohol and vegetable oil in EOs.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Spectroscopy
- Chemometrics
Background:
- Essential oils (EOs) are widely used in various industries.
- Adulteration of EOs with cheaper substances is a significant concern, affecting quality and safety.
- Accurate and rapid detection methods for EO adulteration are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a smartphone-based Raman spectroscopy method combined with machine learning for essential oil analysis.
- To discriminate pure EOs from adulterated ones and identify adulterant types.
- To quantify the levels of specific adulterants in essential oils.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a smartphone-based miniaturized Raman spectrometer for spectral data acquisition.
- Employed machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), for classification.
- Applied Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS) for quantitative analysis of adulterants.
Main Results:
- Achieved excellent performance in discriminating pure EOs from adulterated samples using Random Forest and PLS-DA.
- Successfully identified the type of adulteration, including solvents (benzyl alcohol), vegetable oils, and lower-priced EOs.
- Quantified adulterants with a relative error of prediction (REP) between 2.41% and 7.59% using PLS analysis.
Conclusions:
- The developed smartphone-based Raman spectroscopy and machine learning approach offers a fast, reliable, and portable method for essential oil quality control.
- This technology can effectively detect and quantify adulteration in essential oils, safeguarding product integrity.
- The method holds promise for on-site authentication and quality assessment of essential oils.
Related Concept Videos
Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview
594
A conventional Raman spectrophotometer includes a laser source, a sample holding system, a wavelength selector, and a detector.
The monochromatic laser source, typically using visible or near-infrared radiation, generates a highly focused beam of light. This light interacts with the molecules of the sample, scattering some of the light. Liquid and gaseous samples are usually tested in ordinary glass capillaries, while solids can be analyzed as powders packed in capillaries or as potassium...
The monochromatic laser source, typically using visible or near-infrared radiation, generates a highly focused beam of light. This light interacts with the molecules of the sample, scattering some of the light. Liquid and gaseous samples are usually tested in ordinary glass capillaries, while solids can be analyzed as powders packed in capillaries or as potassium...
594
Raman Spectroscopy: Overview
778
The underlying principle of Raman spectroscopy is based on the interaction between light and matter, specifically molecules' inelastic scattering of photons. When a monochromatic beam of light, typically from a laser source, interacts with a sample, most scattered light has the same frequency as the incident light. This is known as Rayleigh scattering.
However, a small fraction of the scattered light exhibits a frequency shift due to the exchange of energy between the incident photons and...
However, a small fraction of the scattered light exhibits a frequency shift due to the exchange of energy between the incident photons and...
778

