Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

09:31
Hemodynamic Precision in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit using Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography
Published on: January 27, 2023
1.2K
Right ventricular time intervals - Comparison between pulsed wave Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging
Valentino Dammassa1, Costanza Natalia Julia Colombo1, Alessandra Greco2
1Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
|September 23, 2021
Summary
Pulsed wave Doppler (PWD) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) show excellent agreement for measuring right ventricular filling and ejection times in healthy adults. However, agreement is lower for assessing RV total isovolumic time and myocardial performance index.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Physiology
Background:
- Cardiac time intervals are crucial for assessing systolic and diastolic function.
- Echocardiography, using pulsed wave Doppler (PWD) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), is commonly used to measure these intervals.
- Evaluating right ventricular (RV) function is essential in cardiovascular health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the agreement between PWD and TDI in evaluating right ventricular (RV) time intervals in healthy adults.
- To determine the interchangeability of PWD and TDI for various RV functional parameters.
- To identify which RV time intervals show the best agreement between the two echocardiographic techniques.
Main Methods:
- 123 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study.
- Both PWD and TDI were used to measure RV filling time (RVFT), RV ejection time (RVET), heart rate-corrected total filling time (t-FT), total ejection time (t-ET), total isovolumic time (t-IVT), and myocardial performance index (MPI).
- Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation (r) were calculated to assess agreement and correlation.
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement and correlation were observed between PWD and TDI for RVFT (ICC 0.94, r 0.91) and good agreement for RVET (ICC 0.63, r 0.68).
- Good agreement and strong correlation were found for heart rate-corrected intervals: t-FT (ICC 0.67, r 0.59) and t-ET (ICC 0.71, r 0.74).
- Lower agreement was found for RV t-IVT (ICC 0.52, r 0.57) and MPI (ICC 0.36, r 0.50).
Conclusions:
- PWD and TDI are interchangeable for measuring RVFT, RVET, t-FT, and t-ET in healthy adults.
- The agreement between PWD and TDI is limited for assessing RV t-IVT and MPI.
- These findings support the use of both PWD and TDI for specific RV functional assessments, highlighting areas where caution is needed.

