Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Performance of Prognostic Risk Scores in Elderly Chinese Patients with Heart Failure
Yalin Cheng1, Ke Chai1, Wanrong Zhu1
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Insights
The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) demonstrated superior accuracy over the MAGGIC score for predicting 1-year mortality in elderly Chinese patients with heart failure (HF). This validation is crucial for improving risk stratification in this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Elderly patients with heart failure (HF) exhibit distinct clinical profiles and poorer prognoses than younger individuals.
- Existing prognostic risk scores for HF often lack robust validation in elderly populations.
- Accurate risk assessment is vital for tailoring management strategies in geriatric HF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the prognostic performance of the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score.
- To assess the discrimination, calibration, and reclassification capabilities of both scores in an elderly Chinese HF cohort.
- To determine which risk score offers superior prediction of 1-year mortality in this specific demographic.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 675 elderly HF patients (age ≥70 years) discharged between 2012 and 2017.
- Evaluation of risk score performance using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for discrimination.
- Assessment of calibration via calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test, with net reclassification index (NRI) for comparison.
Main Results:
- The SHFM showed better discrimination (c-statistic 0.72) than the MAGGIC score (c-statistic 0.67, P=0.05).
- SHFM demonstrated superior calibration (H-L χ²=8.2, P=0.41) compared to the MAGGIC score (H-L χ²=18.8, P=0.02) for 1-year mortality.
- The SHFM achieved a significantly higher net reclassification index (NRI) of 2.96% (P<0.0001) compared to the MAGGIC score.
Conclusions:
- The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) exhibits superior performance compared to the MAGGIC score in predicting 1-year mortality for elderly Chinese HF patients.
- SHFM provides good discrimination, calibration, and risk classification, making it a reliable tool for this population.
- These findings support the use of SHFM for improved prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making in elderly Chinese individuals with heart failure.
Purpose:
Elderly heart failure (HF) patients have different clinical characteristics and poorer prognosis compared with younger patients. Prognostic risk scores for HF have not been validated well in elderly patients. We aimed to validate the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score in an elderly Chinese HF cohort.
Patients And Methods:
This retrospective study enrolled 675 elderly HF patients (age≥70 years) discharged from our hospital between 2012 and 2017. The performance of the two risk scores was evaluated in terms of discrimination, using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, and calibration using a calibration plot and Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test. Absolute risk reclassification was used to compare the two scores.
Results:
During the mean follow-up time of 32.6 months, 193 patients (28.6%) died, and 1-year mortality was 10.5%. The predicted median 1-year mortality was 8% for the SHFM and 18% for the MAGGIC score. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated that event rates of all-cause mortality significantly increased with increasing SHFM and MAGGIC scores. The discriminatory capacity of the SHFM was greater than that of the MAGGIC score (c-statistics were 0.72 and 0.67, respectively; P = 0.05). The calibration plot for the SHFM was better than that for MAGGIC score for 1-year mortality (SHFM: H-L χ2 =8.2, P = 0.41; MAGGIC: H-L χ2 =18.8, P =0.02). Compared with the MAGGIC score, the net reclassification index (NRI) of the SHFM was 2.96% (Z=5.88, P< 0.0001).
Conclusion:
The SHFM performs better than MAGGIC score, having good discrimination, calibration and risk classification for the prediction of 1-year mortality in elderly Chinese HF patients.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure I: Introduction

