Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
ctDNA-Profiling-Based UBL Biological Process Mutation Status as a Predictor of Atezolizumab Response Among
Jun Lu1,2,3, Yanwei Zhang1, Yuqing Lou1
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract:
Atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for use in clinical practice in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but potential biomarkers for response stratification still need further screening. In the present study, a total of 399 patients with high-quality ctDNA profiling results were included. The mutation status of ubiquitin-like conjugation (UBL) biological process genes (including ABL1, APC, LRP6, FUBP1, KEAP1, and TOP2A) and clinical information were further integrated. The results suggested that the patients with the clinical characteristics of male or history of smoking had a higher frequency of UBL mutation positivity [UBL (+)]; the patients who were UBL (+) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (1.69 vs. 3.22 months, p = 0.0007) and overall survival (8.61 vs. 16.10 months, p < 0.0001) than those patients with UBL mutation negativity [UBL (-)]; and more promising predictive values were shown in the smoker subgroup and ≤ 3 metastasis subgroup. More interestingly, we found the predictor has more performance in TP53-negative cohorts [training in an independent POPLAR and OAK cohorts (n = 200), and validation in an independent MSKCC cohort (n = 127)]. Overall, this study provides a predictor, UBL biological process gene mutation status, not only for identifying NSCLC patients who may respond to atezolizumab therapy but also for screening out the potential NSCLC responders who received other immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Insights
Ubiquitin-like conjugation gene mutations predict atezolizumab response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with these mutations had shorter survival, but the predictor showed promise in specific subgroups, especially in TP53-negative cohorts.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Immunotherapy
Background:
- Atezolizumab is approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but biomarkers for patient selection are needed.
- Ubiquitin-like conjugation (UBL) biological process genes are implicated in cancer development and progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of UBL gene mutation status as a predictive biomarker for atezolizumab response in NSCLC patients.
- To identify patient subgroups where UBL mutation status is a more effective predictor.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of ctDNA profiling and clinical data from 399 NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab.
- Integration of mutation status of key UBL genes (ABL1, APC, LRP6, FUBP1, KEAP1, TOP2A) with clinical characteristics.
- Validation of predictive performance in independent cohorts, including TP53-negative subgroups.
Main Results:
- UBL mutation positivity (UBL [+]) was associated with male sex and smoking history.
- UBL (+) patients exhibited significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to UBL (-) patients.
- The UBL mutation status demonstrated stronger predictive value in smokers and patients with ≤ 3 metastases, and particularly in TP53-negative cohorts.
Conclusions:
- UBL biological process gene mutation status serves as a potential predictive biomarker for atezolizumab therapy in NSCLC.
- This biomarker can aid in identifying NSCLC patients likely to respond to atezolizumab and potentially other immune checkpoint inhibitors.
- Further stratification using UBL mutation status may optimize patient selection for immunotherapy in NSCLC.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020