Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K

Specificity effects in reasoning with counterintuitive and arbitrary conditionals.

Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castañeda1, Markus Knauff2

  • 1Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Giessen, Germany. Estefania.Gazzo@psychol.uni-giessen.de.

Memory & Cognition
|September 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

63.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
63.5K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

39
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
39
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

62.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
62.2K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

186
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
186
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reasoning beyond clicks: Disentangling counterexamples and probabilities in conditional reasoning.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain.

NeuroImage·2023
Same author

Editors' Review and Introduction: Levels of Explanation in Cognitive Science: From Molecules to Culture.

Topics in cognitive science·2020
Same author

Different cognitive styles can affect performance in laparoscopic surgery skill training.

Surgical endoscopy·2019
Same author

Odors Can Serve as Landmarks in Human Wayfinding.

Cognitive science·2019
Same author

How to infer possibilities: A reply to Oaksford et al. (2018).

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2019

Specific phrasing increases belief in unbelievable or arbitrary conditional conclusions. This study explored how specificity impacts reasoning with counterintuitive and arbitrary conditional statements.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Reasoning
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Prior knowledge strengthens acceptance of specific conditional conclusions over general ones.
  • The influence of specificity on reasoning with unbelievable or arbitrary conditionals remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether specific phrasing enhances the acceptance of conclusions from unbelievable and arbitrary conditionals.
  • To examine the effect of conditional statement specificity on logical inference.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted, varying the specificity of counterintuitive and arbitrary conditionals.
  • Participants evaluated conclusions from Modus Ponens (MP) and Affirming the Consequent (AC) inferences on a 7-point Likert scale.
  • Instructions encouraged reasoning as in daily life.
Keywords:
Conditional reasoningPrior knowledgeSpecificity

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Main Results:

  • A significant specificity effect was observed in both experiments.
  • Participants provided higher acceptance ratings for conclusions derived from specific conditionals compared to unspecific ones.
  • This effect held for both counterintuitive and arbitrary conditional statements.

Conclusions:

  • Specificity in conditional statements plays a crucial role in modulating conclusion acceptance, even when the conditionals are unbelievable or arbitrary.
  • The findings suggest that linguistic framing significantly influences human judgment and reasoning processes.