Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

What are Populations and Communities?

What are Populations and Communities?

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Frequency-dependent Selection

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

Formation of Species

Formation of Species

Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.

Group Polarization

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.

Diversity of Protists II

Diversity of Protists II

Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Body Mass-Biomass Scaling Modulates Species Keystone-Ness to Press Perturbations.

Ecology letters·2025

Same author

Seasonal Shifts in Trophic Interaction Strength Drive Stability of Natural Food Webs.

Ecology letters·2025

Same author

Eco-phenotypic feedback loops differ in multistressor environments.

Ecology·2024

Same author

Trait adaptation enhances species coexistence and reduces bistability in an intraguild predation module.

Ecology and evolution·2023

Same author

A sterol-mediated gleaner-opportunist trade-off underlies the evolution of grazer resistance to cyanobacteria.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2022

Same author

Neutralization of Dengue Virus Serotypes by Sera from Dengue-Infected Individuals Is Preferentially Directed to Heterologous Serotypes and Not against the Autologous Serotype Present in Acute Infection.

Viruses·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Self-organised pattern formation increases local diversity in metacommunities.

Christian Guill¹, Janne Hülsemann¹, Toni Klauschies¹

¹Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Ecology Letters

|September 24, 2021

Summary

Spatial pattern formation in ecosystems can enhance biodiversity. Dispersal in metacommunities drives complex patterns, increasing local diversity and adaptability compared to isolated patches.

Keywords:

Turing instability biomass-trait feedback fitness gradient food chain functional diversity metacommunity self-organisation source-sink dynamics spatio-temporal pattern trait-based aggregate model

More Related Videos

Mapping the Emergent Spatial Organization of Mammalian Cells using Micropatterns and Quantitative Imaging

Mapping the Emergent Spatial Organization of Mammalian Cells using Micropatterns and Quantitative Imaging

Published on: April 30, 2019

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Mapping the Emergent Spatial Organization of Mammalian Cells using Micropatterns and Quantitative Imaging

Mapping the Emergent Spatial Organization of Mammalian Cells using Micropatterns and Quantitative Imaging

Published on: April 30, 2019

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

Area of Science:

Ecology
Theoretical Ecology
Community Ecology

Background:

Self-organized spatial pattern formation is common in ecosystems, but its impact on community diversity remains unclear.
Autotroph diversity, characterized by traits influencing growth and defense, is central to understanding these patterns.
Isolated ecological patches tend to lose diversity over time, converging to stable states dominated by either defended or undefended species.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how self-organized spatial patterns influence community diversity within a food chain model.
To compare diversity dynamics in isolated patches versus a metacommunity context with dispersal.

Main Methods:

Utilized a food chain model with a continuous trait distribution for autotrophs.
Simulated community dynamics on isolated patches and in a metacommunity with dispersal.
Analyzed the emergence of spatio-temporal patterns and their effect on species abundances and diversity.

Main Results:

Isolated patches led to diversity loss and convergence to alternative stable states (defended or undefended species dominance).
Dispersal in the metacommunity context destabilized these states, generating complex spatio-temporal patterns.
Biomass-trait feedback associated with pattern formation significantly increased local diversity by an order of magnitude.

Conclusions:

Self-organized spatial pattern formation, particularly in metacommunities, is crucial for maintaining high local biodiversity.
Dispersal-driven pattern formation enhances community resilience and adaptability to environmental changes.
The study highlights the importance of considering spatial dynamics and dispersal in ecological theory and conservation.