Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

04:19
A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
4.1K
Concerns and recommendations for using Amazon MTurk for eating disorder research.
C Blair Burnette1, Jessica L Luzier2,3, Brooke L Bennett4
1Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
The International Journal of Eating Disorders
|September 25, 2021
Summary
Data from transgender adults recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for eating disorder (ED) research were likely invalid. This study highlights issues with MTurk data quality and suggests methods to improve rigor in online research.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Psychology
- Public Health
- Sociology
Background:
- Online recruitment platforms like Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) are increasingly used for research, including studies on eating disorders (EDs).
- Validating common ED symptom measures in diverse populations, such as transgender adults, is crucial for accurate clinical assessment and intervention.
- Concerns exist regarding the data quality and reliability of participant responses obtained through crowdsourcing platforms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate and norm common eating disorder symptom measures in a large, representative community sample of transgender adults in the United States.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) as a recruitment platform for this population and assess the quality of collected data.
- To identify potential issues with data validity and participant representation in online research.
Main Methods:
- Recruited 2,250 transgender adults across the United States via MTurk.
- Administered demographic questionnaires, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, and the Eating Attitudes Test-26.
- Implemented a comprehensive set of attention and validity checks, alongside analysis of response concordance and qualitative data.
Main Results:
- Standard validity and attention checks were insufficient to detect most invalid responses.
- Analysis of multiple ED measures, weight history, and gender identity revealed significant data discrepancies.
- Qualitative data suggested economic pressures on MTurk workers may compel misrepresentation, compromising data integrity.
Conclusions:
- The majority of data collected via MTurk for this study were likely invalid, raising concerns about previous research using this platform.
- Researchers must exercise extreme caution and implement rigorous methods to mitigate and identify invalid data when using MTurk for eating disorder research.
- Suggestions are provided for improving data quality and reliability in online research settings.

