Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
Quantifying the impact of changes in effective population size and expression level on the rate of coding sequence
1Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive UMR 5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France; École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
The effective population size (Ne) influences molecular evolution rates (ω). This study predicts a weak response of ω to Ne and protein expression levels, suggesting conformational stability alone may not explain observed variations.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Molecular evolution
- Population genetics
Background:
- Molecular sequences evolve under selection and genetic drift, with effective population size (Ne) modulating selection strength.
- The ratio of selected to neutral substitution rates (ω) is expected to decrease with higher Ne due to stronger purifying selection.
- Existing models suggest ω might be independent of Ne, and empirical data show increased protein expression lowers ω.
Purpose of the Study:
- To theoretically approximate the response of ω to changes in Ne and protein expression level.
- To investigate the relationship between genotype, phenotype, fitness, and evolutionary rates.
- To evaluate if protein conformational stability adequately explains empirical variations in ω.
Main Methods:
- Derived a theoretical approximation for ω response using an explicit genotype-phenotype-fitness map.
- Applied the method to proteins under selection for conformational stability.
- Validated findings with simulations using more complex models.
Main Results:
- Predicted a weak and interchangeable response of ω to changes in Ne or expression level.
- The derived theoretical approximation is generally valid for additive traits and log-concave fitness functions.
- Conformational stability alone may not fully explain empirically observed ω variations across species.
Conclusions:
- Protein conformational stability is likely insufficient to explain all observed variations in ω.
- Other biophysical factors, such as protein-protein interactions, may be crucial.
- Future research should explore these additional factors to better understand molecular evolution dynamics.
More Related Videos
07:09A Bioinformatics Pipeline for Investigating Molecular Evolution and Gene Expression using RNA-seq
Published on: May 28, 2021
09:23Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
Published on: August 16, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
What is Population Genetics?
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Speciation Rates
Hardy-Weinberg Principle