Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Beyond categorisation: refining the relationship between subjects and objects in health research regulation
Catriona McMillan1, Edward Dove1, Graeme Laurie1
1School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Health research regulation (HRR) must move beyond fixed subject-object silos to avoid objectifying participants. Processual regulation better recognizes the dynamic relationship between research subjects and objects, enhancing ethical legitimacy.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Health Law and Policy
- Sociology of Science
Background:
- Current health research regulation (HRR) often treats 'subjects' and 'objects' as separate entities.
- This separation risks objectifying research participants by neglecting their subjectivity and experiences.
- Existing regulatory frameworks may not adequately capture the complex interplay within research contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critique the 'subject-object' dichotomy in health research regulation.
- To introduce the concept of liminality to understand the dynamic relationship between research participants and the research process.
- To advocate for regulatory frameworks that embrace processual regulation for enhanced ethical grounding.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis deploying anthropological theories, specifically liminality.
- Critique of existing paradigms in health research regulation.
- Proposal of an alternative regulatory approach: processual regulation.
Main Results:
- The traditional separation of 'subject' and 'object' in HRR is a fallacy.
- The concept of liminality highlights the continuous transformation and interconnectedness in research.
- Processual regulation offers a more nuanced approach to understanding research relationships.
Conclusions:
- Health research regulation needs to abandon fixed subject-object silos.
- Recognizing the fluidity and interconnectedness through processual regulation strengthens ethical legitimacy.
- This approach better secures the social license for human health research.
More Related Videos
07:59Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Drug Regulation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Blinding