Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Beyond categorisation: refining the relationship between subjects and objects in health research regulation
Catriona McMillan1, Edward Dove1, Graeme Laurie1
1School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract:
In this article, we argue that the relationship between 'subject' and 'object' is poorly understood in health research regulation (HRR), and that it is a fallacy to suppose that they can operate in separate, fixed silos. By seeking to perpetuate this fallacy, HRR risks, among other things, objectifying persons by paying insufficient attention to human subjectivity, and the experiences and interests related to being involved in research. We deploy the anthropological concept of liminality - concerned with processes of transformation and change over time - to emphasise the enduring connectedness between subject and object in these contexts. By these means, we posit that regulatory frameworks based on processual regulation can better recognise and encompass the fluidity and significance of these relationships, and so ground more securely the moral legitimacy and social licence for human health research.
More Related Videos
07:59Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Drug Regulation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Blinding