Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Clinical Profile and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience
Abu B H Bhatti1, Abdul A E Sheikh1, Umair S Mahmud1
1Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Insights
This study on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Pakistan found macrovascular invasion is a key poor prognostic marker. Local treatment guidelines effectively manage HCC, showing outcomes comparable to international standards.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Limited centers in Pakistan offer comprehensive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatments.
- A dedicated hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery and liver transplant unit has amassed extensive HCC data.
- This study focuses on the clinical spectrum of HCC within the Pakistani population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Pakistani patients.
- To compare the effectiveness of local treatment guidelines against the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging algorithm.
- To identify prognostic factors influencing survival in HCC patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of HCC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016.
- Treatment allocation based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging algorithm and local guidelines.
- Curative (RFA, PEI, resection, transplant), palliative (TACE/sorafenib), and best supportive care (BSC) treatment groups were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Hepatitis B and C were the predominant causes (90.6%) in 1,490 HCC patients.
- Macrovascular invasion (MVI) was observed in 33% of patients, identified as a significant poor prognostic marker.
- Five-year survival rates varied significantly: liver transplant (87%), RFA/PEI (64%), TACE (18%), sorafenib (5%), and BSC (0%).
- An alpha-fetoprotein level of 400 ng/mL strongly impacted survival (41% vs. 11%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Macrovascular invasion (MVI) is the most prevalent negative prognostic indicator in Pakistani HCC patients.
- Local treatment guidelines demonstrate efficacy, achieving outcomes comparable to the BCLC staging system.
- Tailoring treatment based on local data and guidelines can optimize HCC management.
Abstract:
Background Very few centers in Pakistan have all established treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) available under one roof. With a dedicated hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery and liver transplant unit, we have gathered one of the largest data on HCC in our population. Aims The objective of the current study was to assess the clinical spectrum of HCC in Pakistani patients. Settings and Design This retrospective review of patients diagnosed with HCC was conducted between 2011 and 2016. Materials and Methods Patients were allocated to treatment groups based on the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging algorithm and our local guidelines. The treatment options were grouped as curative (radiofrequency ablation [RFA], percutaneous ethanol injection [PEI], liver resection, and liver transplantation), palliative (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]/sorafenib), and the best supportive care (BSC). Statistical Analysis Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the statistical analysis. Results The mean age was 57.9 ± 10.1 years (range: 18-90 years). The male-to-female ratio was (1,099/391) 2.8:1. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C were the most common underlying etiological factor in 1,350 of 1,490 (90.6%) patients. Macrovascular invasion (MVI) was seen in 492 of 1,490 (33%) patients. Out of the total, 191 (12.8%) additional patients were offered potentially curative treatments when compared with BCLC recommendations. The actuarial 5-year overall survival for patients who underwent liver transplant, RFA/PEI, TACE, sorafenib, and BSC was 87, 64, 18, 5, and 0%, respectively. Alpha fetoprotein cut-off of 400 ng/mL had a significant impact on survival irrespective of treatment received (41 vs. 11%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion MVI is the most frequent poor prognostic marker in our patients with HCC. Local treatment guidelines are effective in yielding comparable outcomes to BCLC.
More Related Videos
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
09:11Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024