Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
Published on: October 21, 2016
Evaluating the impact of back diffusion on groundwater cleanup time
Robert C Borden1, Ki Young Cha2
1North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Abstract:
Back diffusion of groundwater contaminants from low permeability (K) zones can be a major factor controlling the time to reach cleanup goals in downgradient monitor wells. We identify the aquifer and contaminant characteristics that have the greatest influence on the time (TOoM) after complete source removal for contaminant concentrations to decline by 1, 2 and 3 Orders-of-Magnitude (T1, T2 and T3). Two aquifer configurations are evaluated: (a) layered geometry (LG) with finite thickness low K layers; and (b) boundary geometry (BG) with thick semi-infinite low K boundaries. A semi-analytical modeling approach (Muskus and Falta, 2018) is used to simulate the concentration decline following source removal for a range of conditions and generate ≈21,000 independent values of T1, T2 and T3. Linear regression is applied to interpret this large dataset and develop simple relationships to estimate TOoM from three characteristic parameters - the mass residence time (TM), diffusion time (TD), and ratio of low K to high K mass storage (γ). TM is most important predictor of T1, T2 and T3 for both geometries and is equal to the combined high and low K contaminant mass divided by the mass flux, at the end of the loading period (TL). For LG, T3 is strongly influenced by TD = RLLD2/(4D*), where RL is the low K retardation factor, LD is the half-thickness of the embedded low K layers, and D* is the effective diffusion coefficient. For BG, T3 is strongly influenced by γ. Contaminant decay in low K zones can significantly reduce cleanup times when λLTD > 0.01, where λL is the effective first order decay rate in the low K zone. The 1st Damköhler (Da), equal to TM/TD, provides a useful indicator of the relative importance of back diffusion on TOoM. Back diffusion impacts are greatest on T3 when 0.01 > Da > 0.1, then decrease with increasing Da. Back diffusion has less impacts on T2, with limited influence on T1. The results are summarized in a simple conceptual model to aid in evaluating the impact of back diffusion on the time for concentrations to decline by 1-3 OoM.
More Related Videos
12:22Speciation and Bioavailability Measurements of Environmental Plutonium Using Diffusion in Thin Films
Published on: November 9, 2015
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Bioremediation
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Diffusion on Chromatography Columns
Longitudinal diffusion occurs when the solute molecules in the mobile phase diffuse from the more concentrated center of the chromatographic band to the more dilute regions on either side, both towards and against the flow direction. This...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Transit, Absorption and Dissolution Time
One of the key parameters is the mean transit time (MTT), which refers to the total duration required for drug molecules to transit through the body. MTT is determined by calculating the ratio of the area under the moment curve to the area...