Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Progression of aortic stenosis in patients with bicuspid aortic valve
Michael Shang1, Arianna Kahler-Quesada1, Makoto Mori1
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Background:
Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital heart defect and predisposes patients to developing aortic stenosis more frequently and at a younger age than the general population. However, the influence of bicuspid aortic valve on the rate of progression of aortic stenosis remains unclear.
Methods:
In 236 patients (177 tricuspid aortic valve and 59 bicuspid aortic valve) matched by initial severity of mild or moderate aortic stenosis, we retrospectively analyzed baseline echocardiogram at diagnosis with latest available follow-up echocardiogram. Baseline comorbidities, annualized progression rate of hemodynamic parameters, and hazard of aortic valve replacement were compared between valve phenotypes.
Results:
Median echocardiographic follow-up was 2.6 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.6-4.2) years. Patients with tricuspid aortic stenosis were significantly older with more frequent comorbid hypertension and congestive heart failure. Median annualized progression rate of mean gradient was 2.3 (IQR 0.6-5.0) mmHg/year versus 1.5 (IQR 0.5-4.1) mmHg/year (p = .5), and that of peak velocity was 0.14 (IQR 0-0.31) m/s/year versus 0.10 (IQR 0.04-0.26) m/s/year (p = .7) for tricuspid versus bicuspid aortic valve, respectively. On multivariate analyses, bicuspid aortic valve was not significantly associated with more rapid progression of aortic stenosis. In a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for baseline mean gradient, bicuspid aortic valve was associated with increased hazard of aortic valve replacement (hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [1.0-3.0], p = .049).
Conclusion:
Bicuspid aortic valve may not significantly predispose patients to more rapid progression of mild or moderate aortic stenosis. Guidelines for echocardiographic surveillance of aortic stenosis need not be influenced by valve phenotype.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

