A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Physician Abortion Practice After Residency

In the United States, 89% of counties have no clinics providing abortion care. Though training residents increases intention to provide abortion care, rates of postresidency abortion provision are low. This study, conducted at one family medicine residency program in the Southwest United States, examines graduates' postresidency practice of abortion care in the context of their intent to provide during residency training.

We collected cross-sectional data from a survey of graduates of University of New Mexico Family Medicine Residency from 2005 to 2017. We performed a mixed-methods analysis using descriptive statistics and conceptual content analysis, including a new methodology of performing content analysis of four subgroups based on intention to provide abortion care at different time points.

The response rate was 46%, with 54 responses to 115 surveys. Only 35% residents who intended to provide abortion care had done so after graduation from residency. Barrier analysis revealed that the three most frequent barriers were structural, with 52% of respondents saying that their workplace would not allow abortion care. The two most frequent themes affecting intention were "competence" and feeling that abortion care was "medically necessary." However, the two most common themes affecting actual practice were "workplace support" and local "patient access."

This study provides information about the themes associated with changing intentions and practice of abortion care, which may help elucidate new strategies for training residents to anticipate and address challenges to postresidency provision. The study also provides some insight into residents with no intention to provide abortion care in residency who develop an intention to provide abortion care after graduation, which is a group of people for whom there is little information.