Impact of Circulatory Assistance in the Early Evolution After Heart Transplantation. Unicentric Experience

Ana Martínez-Lauwers1, Patricia Arenas2, Víctor Pérez-Roselló2

  • 1University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain.

Transplantation Proceedings
|September 30, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Circulatory support (CS) before heart transplantation (HT) increases the risk of graft failure, infection, and mortality. Mechanical ventilation further worsens outcomes, highlighting CS as a predictor of 1-year mortality post-HT.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Heart transplantation (HT) is a definitive treatment for end-stage heart failure.
  • There's a growing trend of utilizing circulatory support (CS) as a bridge to HT.
  • Understanding the impact of CS on HT outcomes is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes of heart transplantation in patients bridged with circulatory support (CS).
  • To compare patients who received HT with and without prior CS.
  • To identify prognostic factors for 1-year mortality after HT.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective single-center study of 293 HT patients (2009-2018).
  • Analysis of two cohorts: patients with and without CS prior to HT.
  • Collection and review of clinical data and 1-year post-transplant events.

Main Results:

  • Patients bridged with CS had higher rates of primary graft failure, infection, and mortality.
  • Cardiac allograft vasculopathy showed a trend towards lower incidence in the CS group.
  • Mechanical ventilation combined with CS significantly increased graft failure, infection, and renal dysfunction.

Conclusions:

  • Circulatory support as a bridge to HT is associated with increased primary graft failure, infection, and 1-year mortality.
  • The addition of mechanical ventilation to CS negatively impacts prognosis.
  • CS is a significant predictor of 1-year mortality following heart transplantation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos