Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Cost-effectiveness analysis using lifetime attributable risk of proton beam therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma in
Takaaki Yoshimura1,2, Honoka Tamori3, Yasuhiro Morii4
1Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Insights
Proton beam therapy (PBT) is more cost-effective than conventional X-ray therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma. PBT significantly reduces the risk of secondary cancers, improving patient quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers advantages over conventional X-ray therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma, including reduced radiation dose to normal tissues.
- However, the higher cost of PBT necessitates a thorough cost-effectiveness evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of PBT versus conventional X-ray therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma.
- To specifically assess the impact on reducing the risk of rare, serious radiation-induced secondary cancers and their effect on quality of life (QOL).
Main Methods:
- A decision tree model was employed for cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare payer perspective.
- Data was derived from a systematic review, focusing on pediatric patients (<14 years) with medulloblastoma.
- The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) based on cost and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of secondary cancers over a 7.7-year time horizon with a 2% discount rate.
Main Results:
- Conventional X-ray therapy incurred costs of JPY 1,067,608 with a 42% LAR.
- Proton beam therapy (PBT) incurred costs of JPY 2,436,061 with a significantly lower 7% LAR.
- The calculated ICER was JPY 3,856,398 per unit reduction in LAR.
Conclusions:
- Proton beam therapy (PBT) demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness compared to conventional X-ray therapy in mitigating secondary cancer risks for pediatric medulloblastoma.
- The developed ICER, incorporating LAR, serves as a valid metric for evaluating cost-effectiveness in the context of radiation-induced secondary cancers.
Abstract:
Compared to conventional X-ray therapy, proton beam therapy (PBT) has more clinical and physical advantages such as irradiation dose reduction to normal tissues for pediatric medulloblastoma. However, PBT is expensive. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of PBT for pediatric medulloblastoma with that of conventional X-ray therapy, while focusing on radiation-induced secondary cancers, which are rare, serious and negatively affect a patient's quality of life (QOL). Based on a systematic review, a decision tree model was used for the cost-effectiveness analysis. This analysis was performed from the perspective of health care payers; the cost was estimated from medical fees. The target population was pediatric patients with medulloblastoma below 14 years old. The time horizon was set at 7.7 years after medulloblastoma treatment. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which was defined as the ratio of the difference in cost and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) between conventional X-ray therapy and PBT. The discount rate was set at 2% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed to model uncertainty. Cost and LAR in conventional X-ray therapy and PBT were Japanese yen (JPY) 1 067 608 and JPY 2436061 and 42% and 7%, respectively. The ICER was JPY 3856398/LAR. In conclusion, PBT is more cost-effective than conventional X-ray therapy in reducing the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers in pediatric medulloblastoma. Thus, our constructed ICER using LAR is one of the valid indicators for cost-effectiveness analysis in radiation-induced secondary cancer.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
05:18Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Relative Risk
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion