Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

458
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
458
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

201
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
201
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

647
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
647
Introduction to Statistical Process Control01:15

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

353
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...
353
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.6K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Questioning the proper comparison of QConnect limits to quality control: rebuttal to Dimech et al.

Pathology·2025
Same author

Reply to Christelli <i>et al.</i>: Implementation of new Westgard Rules suggested by the Westgard Advisor software for five immunological parameters. What Six Sigma, quality control, the analytical Sigma-metric, and Westgard Advisor can and cannot do.

Biochemia medica·2025
Same author

Potential of cold plasma pretreatment for preserving biochemical attributes and ensuring the microbiological safety of saffron stigma.

Food science & nutrition·2024
Same author

The value of Sigma-metrics in laboratory medicine.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2024
Same author

Internal quality control - past, present and future trends.

Advances in laboratory medicine·2023
Same author

Limitations in using the EFLM WG-A/ISO approach for assessment of reagent lot variability.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 18, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

A multi-test planning model for risk based statistical quality control strategies.

Sten A Westgard1, Hassan Bayat2, James O Westgard3

  • 1Westgard QC, Inc., Madison WI, USA.

Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
|September 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Implementing risk-based statistical quality control (SQC) strategies is crucial for multi-test analytic systems. This approach minimizes patient risk by controlling undetected errors, aligning with CLSI C24-Ed4 guidelines.

Keywords:
Frequency of QCMulti-rule QCMulti-stage QCMulti-test analyzerQC rulesQC scheduleRisk based SQC strategyRun sizeStatistical Quality Control

More Related Videos

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.6K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 18, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.6K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Quality Control

Background:

  • Clinical laboratory quality control (QC) for multi-test analytic systems requires effective strategies to minimize patient risk.
  • CLSI C24-Ed4 guidance recommends risk-based bracketed statistical quality control (SQC) strategies.
  • The primary objective is to limit patient risk by controlling the number of erroneous patient test results during undetected error periods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a planning model for developing SQC strategies for continuous production multi-test analytic systems.
  • To align QC frequency (run size) with patient risk assessment using Parvin's model.
  • To facilitate the practical application of risk-based SQC planning in medical laboratories.

Main Methods:

  • A structured planning model is presented for developing SQC strategies.
  • The model incorporates critical variables and aligns with CLSI C24-Ed4 principles.
  • Calculations for QC frequency (run size) are performed using electronic spreadsheets.

Main Results:

  • The planning model was demonstrated using published validation data for multi-test chemistry and enzyme analyzers.
  • The model allows for 'what if' scenario analysis to identify system improvements.
  • It helps in simplifying complex SQC procedures for multi-test systems.

Conclusions:

  • Risk-based SQC strategy planning must integrate operational needs (workload, reporting) with QC frequency (run size).
  • Computer tools for calculating run sizes are essential for practical SQC planning.
  • These tools enable laboratories to efficiently assess the impact of critical variables on SQC effectiveness.