Estimation of the true prevalence of inaccurate artificial inseminations in Irish milk recording dairy cows using a

E T Kelly1, C G McAloon1, M A Crowe1

  • 1School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Inaccurate artificial insemination (IAI) refers to an artificial insemination (AI) that is performed when a cow is not in oestrus. IAIs have economic impacts on the dairy industry through of semen wastage or iatrogenic pregnancy loss. However, few studies have quantified the prevalence of IAIs in a population. The primary objective of this prospective study was to estimate the cow-level true prevalence of IAIs in Irish milk recording dairy herds using a latent class model with a Bayesian framework. Milk samples were collected at a milk recording laboratory from 576 dairy cows in 125 herds who had received an AI on the same day they were sampled for routine milk constituent analysis. Milk progesterone (MP4) analysis was conducted on these samples using radioimmunoassay to determine the progesterone concentration. Fertility data (i.e., subsequent calving date) was retrospectively obtained from the Irish National Cattle Breeding Federation for milk sampled cows and an apparent conception (AC) to the sample AI was determined based on an estimated gestational range of 270-290 days. Both tests (MP4 and AC) were used in a latent class model to estimate the true prevalence of IAI. For the MP4 test, a concentration of ≥ 5 ng/mL in whole milk was deemed to be test positive while for the AC test, a cow that did not conceive to the sampled AI was deemed test positive. Prior information for prevalence of IAI was obtained from a literature review while MP4 sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were obtained from expert opinion. Non-informative priors were used for the Se and Sp of the AC test. Posterior inferences (median and 95 % Bayesian probability intervals; BPI) were obtained using the 'rjags' package in the R statistical software. In the final model, median cow-level true prevalence of IAI was 4.4 % (BPI; 1.7-9.0 %). Median Se and Sp estimates for MP4, were 83.0 % (BPI; 65.0-96.2 %) and were 97.4 % (BPI; 94.6-99.6 %), respectively. Median Se and Sp estimates for AC, were 64.8 % (BPI; 44.5-88.6 %) and 49.8 % (BPI; 45.3-54.1 %), respectively. The present study estimates that the overall cow-level true prevalence of IAI in Irish dairy cows is relatively low. This is the first study to report the cow-level true prevalence of IAI using a Bayesian latent class model.

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

Overview
42.3K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.1K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.6K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.4K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
7.5K