Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

341
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
341
Intellectual Disability01:29

Intellectual Disability

215
Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
215
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K
Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

308
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
308
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

38
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
38

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Moving Beyond Assumptions: The Need for Evidence Around "Institutionalization".

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

The Value of Non-Domination in Supported Decision-Making for Research Participation for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Reasonable to Whom? Rethinking Informed Consent Disclosures in Light of the Research Related Concerns of the Autistic Community.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

The Pitfalls of Media Coverage as Advocacy.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Optimizing Shared Decision Making for Neonatal Resuscitation at Periviability.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2025
Same author

Contemporary uses of "lethal" or "life limiting" terminology in perinatal research.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.1K

Supported Decision-Making: Non-Domination Rather than Mental Prosthesis.

Allison M McCarthy1, Dana Howard2

  • 1Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

AJOB Neuroscience
|October 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Supported medical decision-making for patients with intellectual disabilities should be a collaborative process, not just a trustee providing tools. This approach protects patients from domination and fosters genuine collaboration.

Keywords:
Decision-makingautonomydisabilitymental prosthesisneurodiversitynon-domination

More Related Videos

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.6K
Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
11:16

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis

Published on: July 22, 2014

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.1K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.6K
Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
11:16

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis

Published on: July 22, 2014

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Intellectual Disabilities Research
  • Healthcare Law and Policy

Background:

  • The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and bioethicists advocate for supported medical decision-making for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
  • Existing frameworks, like the 'mental prosthesis' account, conceptualize supported decision-making as trustees providing cognitive tools for patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the 'mental prosthesis' model of supported decision-making.
  • To propose an alternative framework for supported medical decision-making that emphasizes collaboration and protection from domination.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of existing ethical frameworks for supported decision-making.
  • Development of a new conceptual model for supported decision-making grounded in principles of respect and non-domination.

Main Results:

  • The 'mental prosthesis' model risks reinforcing isolated self-determination and may not fully support patient autonomy.
  • An alternative collaborative model protects patients from trustee domination and preserves opportunities for genuine shared decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • Supported medical decision-making for patients with intellectual disabilities is best understood as a respectful, collaborative relationship.
  • Protecting patients from domination is crucial for enabling authentic participation and preserving patient dignity in medical decisions.