Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Humans and machines in biomedical knowledge curation: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy molecular mechanisms'
Mila Glavaški1, Lazar Velicki2,3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia. milaglavaski@yahoo.com.
Insights
Manual and automated curation methods produce different models of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) molecular mechanisms. The best approach depends on whether high-quality data or comprehensive information is prioritized for HCM research.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Informatics
- Computational Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Biomedical knowledge is rapidly expanding and dispersed across scientific literature.
- Curation, the extraction of knowledge into computable forms, can be manual or automated.
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiac disease with incompletely understood genotype-phenotype associations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare human- and machine-curated models of HCM molecular mechanisms.
- To evaluate the performance of different machine curation approaches for HCM.
- To analyze factors influencing the quality of machine-curated models.
Main Methods:
- Developed six distinct models of HCM molecular mechanisms using various curation approaches.
- Analyzed models as biological networks, assessing topological parameters and centrality measures.
- Evaluated the performance of automated reading systems (REACH, TRIPS, Sparser) based on accuracy and extraction performance.
Main Results:
- Created and publicly released six HCM molecular mechanism models and an Interactive HCM map.
- Observed significant differences in network sizes and topological parameters between models, with low consensus on centrality measures.
- Identified calcium as the only consistently important node across models; TRIPS demonstrated the best balance of accuracy and performance for HCM text.
- Generated models with reduced noise and detected cooperatively working elements.
Conclusions:
- Different curation strategies yield diverse disease models, leading to varied analytical conclusions.
- Manual curation is optimal for high-quality, essential model elements.
- Automated curation offers more comprehensive data but with expected noise; strategies exist to mitigate this.
- Automated curation can significantly aid in analyzing the vast and growing body of biomedical knowledge.
Background:
Biomedical knowledge is dispersed in scientific literature and is growing constantly. Curation is the extraction of knowledge from unstructured data into a computable form and could be done manually or automatically. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with genotype-phenotype associations still incompletely understood. We compared human- and machine-curated HCM molecular mechanisms' models and examined the performance of different machine approaches for that task.
Results:
We created six models representing HCM molecular mechanisms using different approaches and made them publicly available, analyzed them as networks, and tried to explain the models' differences by the analysis of factors that affect the quality of machine-curated models (query constraints and reading systems' performance). A result of this work is also the Interactive HCM map, the only publicly available knowledge resource dedicated to HCM. Sizes and topological parameters of the networks differed notably, and a low consensus was found in terms of centrality measures between networks. Consensus about the most important nodes was achieved only with respect to one element (calcium). Models with a reduced level of noise were generated and cooperatively working elements were detected. REACH and TRIPS reading systems showed much higher accuracy than Sparser, but at the cost of extraction performance. TRIPS proved to be the best single reading system for text segments about HCM, in terms of the compromise between accuracy and extraction performance.
Conclusions:
Different approaches in curation can produce models of the same disease with diverse characteristics, and they give rise to utterly different conclusions in subsequent analysis. The final purpose of the model should direct the choice of curation techniques. Manual curation represents the gold standard for information extraction in biomedical research and is most suitable when only high-quality elements for models are required. Automated curation provides more substance, but high level of noise is expected. Different curation strategies can reduce the level of human input needed. Biomedical knowledge would benefit overwhelmingly, especially as to its rapid growth, if computers were to be able to assist in analysis on a larger scale.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification

