Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Behaviorism

Behaviorism

The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...

Law of Effect

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

Self-Regulation

Self-Regulation

Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Continuous foraging behavior shapes patch-leaving decisions in pigeons: a 3D tracking study.

Animal cognition·2026

Same author

Motivation, attention, and uncertainty: insights from animal and human research and implications for addiction.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

The effects of reward uncertainty and alcohol intoxication on human sign- and goal-tracking.

Psychopharmacology·2026

Same author

Unconscious will as a neurobehavioral mechanism against adversity.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2024

Same author

Correction: Implementations of sign- and goal-tracking behavior in humans: A scoping review.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Same author

Implementations of sign- and goal-tracking behavior in humans: A scoping review.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Effort-motivated behavior resolves paradoxes in appetitive conditioning.

Patrick Anselme¹

¹Department of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany.

Behavioural Processes

|October 3, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Organisms exhibit "hope" (effort-based attraction) beyond simple "wanting" (appetite-based attraction) when rewards are uncertain. This challenges the incentive salience hypothesis, suggesting a dual-attraction model for motivated behavior.

Keywords:

Autoshaping Cue attraction Incentive processes Motivation Reward uncertainty

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Ethology
Psychology

Background:

Motivated behavior is often explained by incentive salience, a dopamine-dependent process driving "wanting" or attraction to cues and rewards.
This "wanting" is influenced by factors like hunger and odors, guiding goal-directed actions.
However, observed behaviors sometimes deviate from predictions based solely on incentive salience.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate motivated behavior under conditions of reward uncertainty.
To challenge the sufficiency of the incentive salience hypothesis in explaining all forms of cue-reward seeking.
To propose an alternative framework incorporating "hope" or effort-based attraction.

Main Methods:

Comparing behavioral performance in individuals trained with uncertain versus certain reward schedules.
Analyzing behavioral paradoxes inconsistent with the incentive salience model.
Developing a mathematical model to integrate appetite-based and effort-based attraction.

Main Results:

Behavioral paradoxes emerged under reward uncertainty, indicating limitations of the incentive salience hypothesis.
Organisms demonstrated "hope" – an effort-based attraction – seeking consistent cue-reward associations despite inconsistent outcomes.
The study identified situations where "wanting" alone cannot fully explain motivated seeking behavior.

Conclusions:

The incentive salience model is insufficient to explain all motivated behaviors, particularly under reward uncertainty.
A dual-attraction model, incorporating both "wanting" (appetite-based) and "hope" (effort-based) attraction, provides a more comprehensive explanation.
Understanding the interplay between these attractions is crucial for a complete theory of motivated behavior.