Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025
Evaluation of Biomarkers in Glioma by Immunohistochemistry on Paraffin-Embedded 3D Glioma Neurosphere Cultures
Published on: January 9, 2019
PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas
Mikako Warren1, Nishant Tiwari2, Sabrina Sy1
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Background:
The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.
Methods:
We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.
Results:
The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as "Lipoblastoma 1" with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and "Lipoblastoma 2" with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the "gold standard" for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.
Conclusions:
Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.
