Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026
Measurement of Tissue Non-Heme Iron Content using a Bathophenanthroline-Based Colorimetric Assay
Published on: January 31, 2022
The VitMin Lab Sandwich-ELISA Assays for Iron and Inflammation Markers Compared Well with Clinical Analyzer
Christina M Fischer1, Ming Zhang1, Maya R Sternberg1
1Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Background:
The low cost and small specimen volume of the VitMin Lab ELISA assays for serum ferritin (Fer), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) have allowed their application to micronutrient surveys conducted in low-resource countries for ∼2 decades.
Objectives:
We conducted a comparison between the ELISA and reference-type assays used in the US NHANES.
Methods:
Using the Roche clinical analyzer as a reference, we measured random subsets of the 2016 Nepal National Micronutrient Status Survey (200 serum samples from children aged 6-59 mo; 100 serum samples from nonpregnant women) for Fer, sTfR, CRP, and AGP. We compared the combined data sets with the ELISA survey results using descriptive analyses.
Results:
The Lin's concordance coefficients between the 2 assays were ≥0.89 except for sTfR (Lin's ρ = 0.58). The median relative difference to the reference was as follows: Fer, -8.5%; sTfR, 71.2%; CRP, -19.5%; and AGP, -8.2%. The percentage of VitMin samples agreeing within ±30% of the reference was as follows: Fer, 88.5%; sTfR, 1.70%; CRP, 74.9%; and AGP, 92.9%. The prevalence of abnormal results was comparable between the 2 assays for Fer, CRP, and AGP, and for sTfR after adjusting to the Roche assay. Continued biannual performance (2007-2019) of the VitMin assays in CDC's external quality assessment program (6 samples/y) demonstrated generally acceptable performance.
Conclusions:
Using samples from the Nepal survey, the VitMin ELISA assays produced mostly comparable results to the Roche reference-type assays for Fer, CRP, and AGP. The lack of sTfR assay standardization to a common reference material explains the large systematic difference observed for sTfR, which could be corrected by an adjustment equation pending further validation. This snapshot comparison together with the long-term external quality assessment links the survey data generated by the VitMin Lab to the Roche assays used in NHANES.
