Advantages of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment

Classic treatment of pilonidal sinus is associated with a high rate of complications and a long and painful postoperative period requiring daily wound care, with a decrease in patients' quality of life. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and advantages of the endoscopic technique vs. conventional surgery of pilonidal sinus in the pediatric population.

A quasi-experimental study was carried out in pediatric patients undergoing pilonidal sinus surgery at a single institution in 2019. Excision and healing by secondary intention (EHSI), excision and primary closure (EPC), and Pediatric Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (PEPSiT) were compared. The surgical technique chosen was surgeon-dependent.

49 patients were studied - 14 undergoing PEPSiT, 23 undergoing EHSI, and 12 undergoing EPC. Full healing process was faster in PEPSiT than in EHSI (11 weeks earlier; 95% CI: 6.2-15.9; p < 0.001). Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and need for analgesics were less in the PEPSiT group (p = 0.001). Mean time to return to normal life was shorter with PEPSiT - 78 days earlier than EHSI (95% CI: 42.2-114.9; p < 0.001) and 39 days earlier than EPC (95% CI: -2.5-81.4; p = 0.06). No complications were recorded with PEPSiT, whereas complication rate with EHSI was 69.6%, and complication rate with EPC was 58.3% (p = 0.001).

Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment is effective, with a short and painless postoperative period, and easy wound care. It allows for an early return to normal life without restrictions.