Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Phenotyping patients with borderline elevated esophageal acid exposure
Chanakyaram A Reddy1, Kevin Wenzke2, Lydia S Watts2
1Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Borderline acid exposure time (AET) in reflux monitoring may indicate abnormal esophageal function. Low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) can help identify these patients.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Esophageal Physiology
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Ambulatory reflux monitoring defines pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux based on acid exposure time (AET).
- Lyon Consensus criteria classify AET <4% as normal, >6% as pathologic, and 4-6% as borderline.
- Differentiating borderline AET cases requires further investigation into associated metrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the characteristics of patients with borderline acid exposure time (AET).
- To identify metrics, including mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings, that differentiate borderline AET.
- To assess the clinical significance of borderline AET in conjunction with other diagnostic parameters.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 89 patients with normal (<4%), borderline (4-6%), and abnormal (>6%) AET from pH-impedance monitoring (2015-2019).
- Analysis included demographic data, MNBI, and HRM parameters (Chicago classification v3.0).
- Exclusion criteria included prior foregut surgery, major esophageal motility disorders, or unreliable impedance testing.
Main Results:
- Borderline AET patients exhibited significantly lower MNBI compared to normal AET (1607.7 vs. 2524.0 ohms) and higher MNBI than abnormal AET (951.5 ohms).
- A higher frequency of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was observed in borderline AET patients (42.1%) compared to normal AET (8.0%).
- The prevalence of IEM in borderline AET patients was similar to those with abnormal AET (34.6%).
Conclusions:
- Patients with borderline AET have intermediate MNBI values between normal and abnormal AET groups.
- Borderline AET is frequently associated with IEM, similar to abnormal AET.
- Low MNBI and IEM in patients with borderline AET may warrant increased clinical significance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...

