Biomarkers of response to checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-L1 in lung cancer

Lynette M Sholl1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. lmsholl@bwh.harvard.edu.

Insights

Immunotherapy response in lung cancer varies greatly. New biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression, including tumor mutation burden and genomic profiling, are crucial for predicting treatment success.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, is a cornerstone in treating non-small cell lung carcinoma.
  • Patient responses to immunotherapy are highly variable, ranging from complete remission to rapid progression, highlighting the need for better predictive biomarkers.
  • Current PD-L1 expression testing as a biomarker has limitations in sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, compounded by diverse companion diagnostic assays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current landscape of PD-L1 testing in lung cancer.
  • To explore emerging biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response, including tumor mutation burden, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression, and tumor immune cell infiltration.
  • To emphasize the role of comprehensive genomic profiling in identifying oncogenic drivers and co-mutations that influence immunotherapy outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on immunotherapy biomarkers in non-small cell lung carcinoma.
  • Analysis of the utility of PD-L1 expression testing and its limitations.
  • Discussion of novel predictive markers such as tumor mutation burden, HLA/MHC expression, tumor microenvironment immune cell composition (e.g., via multiplex immunofluorescence), and tumor genomic profiling.

Main Results:

  • PD-L1 expression testing, while standard, has suboptimal predictive accuracy and faces reproducibility challenges.
  • Tumor mutation burden, HLA/MHC expression, and immune cell profiling show promise as complementary or alternative biomarkers.
  • Genomic profiling reveals key oncogenic drivers (e.g., EGFR, ALK, KRAS) and co-mutations (e.g., STK11, KEAP1) that significantly impact immunotherapy efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing immunotherapy for lung cancer requires moving beyond PD-L1 expression to incorporate a multi-faceted biomarker approach.
  • Integrating tumor mutation burden, immune cell analysis, and comprehensive genomic profiling can enhance prediction of treatment response and patient outcomes.
  • Further research and standardization of these advanced biomarkers are essential for clinical implementation in non-small cell lung carcinoma management.

Related Concept Videos