Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Defending two dilemmas
Teresa Baron1,2, Geoffrey Dierckxsens3
1Interdisciplinary Research Lab for Bioethics, Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic baron@flu.cas.cz.
Abstract:
Ashley's response to our recent paper argues that a fuller appreciation of the available clinical data, of the rights of children to autonomy, and of the primary purpose of gender-affirming endocrine treatment supports the rejection of both the pathway and consent dilemmas for the treatment of gender dysphoria, as raised in this journal. In this response, we highlight certain misrepresentations of our argument, and defend our conclusions against Ashley's main objections.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Cognitive Dissonance
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

