Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

16.1K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

42.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
42.2K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

13.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
13.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

92.5K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
92.5K
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

86
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
86

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring stability and change in response patterns to a set of hierarchical scales in a randomized intervention study: an innovative application of latent transition analysis.

Journal of behavioral medicine·2025
Same author

Experiences of mattering among youth: Implications for prevention and intervention.

Journal of prevention & intervention in the community·2025
Same author

A Comparative Study of Item Response Theory Models for Mixed Discrete-Continuous Responses.

Journal of Intelligence·2024
Same author

Improving Knowledge, Engagement, and Self-Efficacy in the Creation of Healthy Home Environments for Mothers Using a Facebook Intervention (Design for Wellness): Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of medical Internet research·2023
Same author

Development and validation of a new questionnaire to assess perceptions regarding DWELL: Design for WELLness.

Health promotion international·2023
Same author

Mattering, wellness, and fairness: Psychosocial goods for the common good.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.9K

Mattering in the community: Domain and demographic differences in a US sample.

Michael P Scarpa1, Cengiz Zopluoglu2, Isaac Prilleltensky1

  • 1School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.

Journal of Community Psychology
|October 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Mattering, feeling valued and adding value, shows significant demographic differences across life domains. High income, education, and employment correlate with higher mattering, with most people reporting adding value over feeling valued.

Keywords:
community matteringecological measurementgroup comparisonmattering

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.9K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Health Sciences

Background:

  • Mattering, defined as experiences of feeling valued and adding value, is crucial in psychological and social contexts.
  • Understanding demographic variations in mattering is important for targeted interventions and support.
  • The recent validation of the Multidimensional Inventory of Daily Life Satisfaction (MIDLS) scale enables domain-specific mattering analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze demographic group differences in domain-specific mattering using a representative US sample.
  • To investigate associations between demographic variables and mattering across self, relationships, work, and community domains.
  • To explore whether individuals are more likely to report adding value or feeling valued.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a representative United States sample.
  • Utilized the validated Multidimensional Inventory of Daily Life Satisfaction (MIDLS) scale to measure domain-specific mattering.
  • Examined differences in mattering across demographic groups (age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, income, education, employment).

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in domain-specific mattering were found across all demographic variables, despite few differences in overall mattering.
  • Higher income, advanced degrees, and employment were consistently linked to increased mattering across domains.
  • Individuals more frequently reported adding value than feeling valued across demographic groups and life domains.

Conclusions:

  • Mattering is a multidimensional construct with significant variations across demographic groups and life domains.
  • Socioeconomic and employment factors appear to be strong correlates of mattering.
  • The findings provide initial insights into demographic differences in mattering within a US sample, highlighting the importance of a multidimensional approach.