Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.5K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.0K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.3K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.3K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.0K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.0K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.4K
Reducing Line Loss01:18

Reducing Line Loss

219
In a three-phase circuit, line loss is an indicator of energy dissipated as heat due to the resistance of transmission lines. To address this, incorporating transformers into the system—a step-up transformer at the source and a step-down transformer at the load—is a strategic solution. Two three-phase transformers are introduced to improve this.
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss...
219

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional and transcriptomic characterization of the receptor-like protein kinase gene GmHSL1b involved in salt stress tolerance in soybean roots.

Physiologia plantarum·2025
Same author

High-efficiency and sustainable peroxymonosulfate activation on Fe single-atom catalyst through incorporating complementary S species for enhanced water decontamination.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2025
Same author

A noncanonical role of SAT1 enables anchorage independence and peritoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Effect of Hypoglycemic Drugs on Patients with Heart Failure with or without T2DM: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine·2025
Same author

Cuproptosis inhibits tumor progression and enhances cisplatin toxicity in ovarian cancer.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2025
Same author

US disruptions to science could transform global research landscape.

Nature·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
09:43

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

10.0K

Cause-aware failure detection using an interpretable XGBoost for optical networks.

Chunyu Zhang, Danshi Wang, Lingling Wang

    Optics Express
    |October 7, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a cause-aware failure detection method for optical transport network (OTN) boards using interpretable machine learning. The approach accurately identifies failure causes, achieving over 98% F1 score by analyzing environmental temperature features.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Oct 17, 2025

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    10.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Network Engineering
    • Machine Learning
    • Data Science

    Background:

    • Failure detection is critical in network management, with machine learning (ML), particularly neural networks (NNs), widely used in optical networks.
    • The 'black-box' nature of NNs hinders interpretability, making it difficult to understand failure detection mechanisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a cause-aware failure detection scheme for optical transport network (OTN) boards.
    • To enhance the interpretability of ML-based failure detection in OTN.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized the interpretable extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm for failure detection.
    • Applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to ensure consistent feature attribution and identify key failure indicators.
    • Evaluated performance on two types of OTN boards using balanced and unbalanced datasets.

    Main Results:

    • Achieved an F1 score exceeding 98% for failure detection on both OTN board types.
    • Identified average and maximum environmental temperature as the most relevant features for the two types of OTN board failures, respectively.
    • Demonstrated consistent feature attribution using SHAP values.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed cause-aware scheme effectively detects OTN board failures with high accuracy.
    • Interpretable ML methods like XGBoost and SHAP provide valuable insights into failure causes, specifically related to environmental temperature.
    • This approach enhances network reliability and facilitates proactive maintenance.