Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb
Xiao-Hua Zhang1, Tao Gu1, Xuan-Wei Liu1
1Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Dapeng New District Nanao People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Abstract:
Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups: a tDCS group (n = 61) and a FES group (n = 61). All patients received same routine rehabilitation and equal treatment quality, the tDCS group was treated with tDCS, while the FES group received FES. The lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Barthel index (MBI), functional ambulatory category (FAC), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were used to assess the patients at three different stages: prior to treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The assessment scores for FMA, MBI, and FAC for the lower extremities after treatment (P > 0.05) were compared with those before treatment. The FMA, MBI, and FAC scores of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the FES group in all three stages (P < 0.05). The FMA, MBI, and FAC assessment scores of both groups were significantly higher after 4 weeks of treatment than that before treatment, and the scores after 8 weeks of treatment were significantly higher than those after 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). The P40, N45 latencies decreased and the P40, N45 amplitudes increased, but there was no significant difference before treatment and after treatment (P >0.05), and there was no significant difference of the tDCS and FES groups before treatment and after treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, FMA, MBI, and FAC indicate that both tDCS and FES can significantly promote the recovery of a patient's leg motor function and tDCS is more effective than FES in the stroke recovery stage. The application value of SEP in stroke patients remains to be further studied.
More Related Videos
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014
08:22Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: An Update on Safety and Tolerability
Published on: October 7, 2017