Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
Yi-Xin Zhou1, Ping Chen1, Yu-Ting Sun2
1Department of VIP Region, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Background:
KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC.
Methods:
Patients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
Results:
Indirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63-1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47-0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22-5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73-7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99-1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32-1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab.
Conclusions:
Combining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS.
Insights
This study compared programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Nivolumab showed a survival benefit for patients with performance status 1, while pembrolizumab and camrelizumab offered higher efficacy for others.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials established programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors for second-line therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
- No direct head-to-head comparisons exist for pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and camrelizumab in the second-line ESCC setting.
- This study provides an indirect comparison to guide the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced ESCC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and camrelizumab in the second-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
- To identify the optimal immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based on patient characteristics and desired outcomes.
Main Methods:
- An indirect comparison was performed using data from the KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials.
- Only data from squamous carcinoma patients in KEYNOTE-181 were included, along with all patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT.
- Key outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
Main Results:
- All three PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated similar survival benefits.
- Nivolumab showed a slight advantage over pembrolizumab for patients with a performance status (PS) score of 1.
- Pembrolizumab and camrelizumab showed improved PFS and significantly higher ORR compared to nivolumab, though camrelizumab was associated with a higher rate of TRAEs.
Conclusions:
- Nivolumab is recommended for ESCC patients with PS score of 1.
- Pembrolizumab or camrelizumab are recommended for patients with better PS, seeking higher efficacy or longer PFS.
- The choice of ICI should consider patient PS and desired treatment outcomes, balancing efficacy with safety profiles.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

