Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Multimorbidity measures from health administrative data using ICD system codes: A systematic review.
Marc Simard1,2, Elham Rahme3, Alexandre Campeau Calfat2
1Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
This review found significant variation in multimorbidity measures. Many measures lack robustness, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to assessing population health and improving research accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Multimorbidity, the co-occurrence of multiple chronic conditions, is a growing public health concern.
- Accurate measurement of multimorbidity is crucial for understanding population health and informing healthcare policy.
- Health administrative data, utilizing International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, are increasingly used to identify diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and characterize adult population-based multimorbidity measures derived from health administrative data.
- To assess the methodological quality and heterogeneity of existing multimorbidity measures.
- To identify areas for improvement in the development and application of multimorbidity assessment tools.
Main Methods:
- A narrative systematic review was conducted on studies developing or validating multimorbidity measures.
- Key aspects compared included the number of diseases, case definition processes, and validation strategies.
- Methodological robustness was evaluated using eight criteria, including general indicator assessment (AIRE instrument) and multimorbidity-specific criteria.
Main Results:
- Twenty-two distinct multimorbidity measures were identified, incorporating 5 to 84 diseases (median 20).
- Most measures (19/22) included both physical and mental health conditions, primarily using ICD codes from inpatient/outpatient data (18/22).
- Only six measures met at least six of the eight robustness criteria, indicating significant heterogeneity and variable quality.
Conclusions:
- A substantial portion (approximately one-third) of multimorbidity measures derived from administrative data are of low to moderate methodological quality.
- Significant heterogeneity exists in the composition and validation of these measures.
- Developing a more consensual approach to defining the number and types of diseases included in multimorbidity measures is recommended to enhance comparability and reduce confounding in research.
More Related Videos
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Integrated Healthcare System
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...