Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
Published on: May 31, 2011
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
Micah D J Peters1,2,3, Casey Marnie1, Heather Colquhoun4,5
1University of South Australia, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Playford Building P4-27, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, South Australia.
Scoping reviews are vital for evidence synthesis. Adhering to updated methodological guidance and reporting standards ensures rigorous, high-quality reviews for informed decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Evidence synthesis methodology
- Research integrity
Background:
- Scoping reviews are increasingly common for evidence synthesis.
- Methodological guidance, including JBI and PRISMA-Scoping, is available.
- Ensuring consistent application of these tools is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an update on scoping review methodology development.
- To clarify the differences between scoping reviews and other review types.
- To highlight critical components for improving the rigor of scoping reviews.
Main Methods:
- Review of current scoping review methodologies and guidance.
- Discussion of ongoing work in scoping review methods development.
- Identification of areas for future enhancement, such as stakeholder engagement.
Main Results:
- Scoping review methodology is evolving, with updated guidance available.
- Inconsistent application of tools can impact review rigor.
- Stakeholder engagement is a key area for future development.
Conclusions:
- High-quality scoping reviews require adherence to current methodological guidance and reporting criteria.
- Standardized approaches and clear reporting enhance review integrity.
- Evolving scoping review methods support policy and decision-making.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
The Scope of Physics
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Quality Assurance
Overview of Microscopy Techniques

