Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy As a Chronic Heart Failure Model in Swine
Published on: February 17, 2018
Do the predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy add up?
Harsha Teja Perla1, Sirish Chandra Srinath Patloori1, Anand Manickavasagam1
1Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Insights
Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) risk increases with lower baseline LVEF, longer paced QRS duration, and higher RV pacing burden. Two or more factors significantly elevate PICM odds, but a narrower paced QRS may reduce risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiomyopathy Research
Background:
- Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is a growing concern in patients with pacemakers.
- Understanding predisposing factors is crucial for risk stratification and prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of PICM in patients with preserved LVEF undergoing pacemaker implantation.
- To identify independent predictors of PICM and assess their cumulative risk.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 749 patients with preserved LVEF who received pacemakers between 2012 and 2018.
- Identification of risk factors including baseline LVEF, paced QRS duration, and RV pacing burden.
Main Results:
- PICM developed in 9.9% of patients over a median follow-up of 2.2 years.
- Independent predictors identified: baseline LVEF <55%, paced QRS duration >160 ms, and RV pacing burden >33%.
- Patients with ≥2 risk factors had a 12-fold increased odds of developing PICM.
Conclusions:
- Low-normal baseline LVEF, wider paced QRS, and higher RV pacing burden are significant predictors of PICM.
- The cumulative effect of these risk factors substantially increases PICM development.
- Optimizing paced QRS duration, a modifiable factor, may be key in mitigating PICM risk.
Objective:
Knowledge of factors causing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is incomplete. We sought to estimate the incidence and predisposing factors for PICM and evaluate if the risk they portend adds up.
Methods:
Single centre retrospective study where consecutive patients with preserved LVEF undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation between 2012 and 2018 were analysed.
Results:
A total of 749 patients (68.4 % male; mean age 59.2 ± 14.08 years) were included in the analysis. PICM developed in 74 (9.9%) patients over a median follow up of 2.2 years (IQR 1.1-3.2). Pre-implant LVEF, paced QRS duration and RV pacing burden were independent predictors of PICM. Using 90 % specificity cut-off values for LVEF and paced QRS, and the value separating lowest tertile of RV pacing from the higher tertiles, three risk factors were identified: (i) baseline LVEF < 55 %, (ii) paced QRS duration > 160 msec, and (iii) RV pacing burden > 33 %. Patients with two or more risk factors were at the highest risk (OR 11.62, 95 % CI 4.62-29.21, p-value < 0.001) for developing PICM while those with one risk factor had an intermediate risk (OR 3.89, 95 % CI 1.62-9.34, p-value 0.002) when compared to those without any risk factors.
Conclusion:
Low-normal baseline LVEF, wider paced QRS and higher RV pacing burden independently predicted the development of PICM. The presence of ≥2 factors increased the odds of PICM, twelve-fold. A narrower paced QRS, the only modifiable risk factor may help mitigate development of PICM.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
09:36Dual-Dye Optical Mapping of Hearts from RyR2R2474S Knock-In Mice of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
Published on: December 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy