Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Leaving Groups02:14

Leaving Groups

8.3K
The nature of leaving groups strongly influences the outcome of a nucleophilic substitution reaction.
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.  
In a...
8.3K
The Pauli Exclusion Principle03:06

The Pauli Exclusion Principle

55.6K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
55.6K
Underflow Gates01:30

Underflow Gates

137
Underflow gates are vital for controlling water flow in irrigation canals. The three main types of underflow gates — vertical, radial, and drum gates — serve different purposes while ensuring effective flow management. Vertical gates move up and down, generating a free-flowing water jet; radial gates pivot to regulate the flow; and drum gates rotate for precise adjustments. The flow through these gates is influenced by downstream conditions, resulting in free or drowned outflow.Free and...
137
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

42.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
42.2K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

34.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
34.6K
Barriers to Effective Communication II01:21

Barriers to Effective Communication II

4.1K
The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Predictors of Adolescent Well-Being in a Digital Age: A Focus on Digital Skills and Mental Health Literacy.

Journal of adolescence·2026
Same author

Social Media Influencers, Health Literacy, and Food Literacy: A Correlational Study Among Adolescents.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025
Same author

Hospital brochures in mental healthcare. how patient-centered are they?

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2024
Same author

Can popular magazines educate people with depression? An investigation of articles' understandability, reliability, and actionability.

PEC innovation·2023
Same author

Do we all speak the same language? A critical systemic functional discourse analysis of psychiatric hospital brochures.

Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)·2022
Same author

Task complexity, student perceptions of vocabulary learning in EFL, and task performance.

The British journal of educational psychology·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 1. Biosafety Level 4 Suit Laboratory Suite Entry and Exit Procedures
09:54

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 1. Biosafety Level 4 Suit Laboratory Suite Entry and Exit Procedures

Published on: October 3, 2016

36.4K

You're not getting in.

Lies Sercu1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, KU Leuven (Catholic University Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.

Patient Education and Counseling
|October 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary

A psychiatric hospital intake worsened a mentally ill patient's condition, nearly causing suicide. Caregiver behavior during gatekeeping procedures can negatively impact patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Care
  • Patient Experience

Background:

  • University psychiatric hospitals serve as critical access points for mental health treatment.
  • Patient intake procedures are the initial interaction and can significantly influence the therapeutic journey.
  • Negative initial experiences can deter patients from seeking or continuing care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate how a patient's mental state can be exacerbated during a psychiatric hospital intake.
  • To highlight the impact of caregiver behavior and contextual factors on patient outcomes during gatekeeping.
  • To underscore the importance of sensitive and effective intake procedures in psychiatric settings.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative case study.
  • Narrative account of a patient's intake experience.
Keywords:
Emotional intelligenceEmpathyGatekeepingReferral & consultationUniversity psychiatric hospital

More Related Videos

Shallow Water Paddling Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice
07:47

Shallow Water Paddling Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice

Published on: June 3, 2013

23.8K
Zebrafish Brain Ventricle Injection
08:28

Zebrafish Brain Ventricle Injection

Published on: April 6, 2009

22.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 1. Biosafety Level 4 Suit Laboratory Suite Entry and Exit Procedures
09:54

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 1. Biosafety Level 4 Suit Laboratory Suite Entry and Exit Procedures

Published on: October 3, 2016

36.4K
Shallow Water Paddling Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice
07:47

Shallow Water Paddling Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice

Published on: June 3, 2013

23.8K
Zebrafish Brain Ventricle Injection
08:28

Zebrafish Brain Ventricle Injection

Published on: April 6, 2009

22.0K
  • Analysis of contextual and caregiver interaction factors.

    • Main Results:

    • The patient's disruptive intake experience nearly led to suicide.
    • Caregiver behavior and the gatekeeping context aggravated the patient's mental distress.
    • The intake process failed to alleviate, and instead worsened, the patient's condition.

    Conclusions:

    • Psychiatric gatekeeping procedures require careful management to avoid patient harm.
    • Caregiver training in empathetic and effective communication is crucial during patient intake.
    • The initial patient encounter significantly influences the trajectory of mental health treatment.