Asymptotic analysis of reliability measures for an imperfect dichotomous test
1Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
Abstract:
To access the reliability of a new dichotomous test and to capture the random variability of its results in the absence of a gold standard, two measures, the inconsistent acceptance probability (IAP) and inconsistent rejection probability (IRP), were introduced in the literature. In this paper, we first analyze the limiting behavior of both measures as the number of test repetitions increases and derive the corresponding accuracy estimates and rates of convergence. To overcome possible limitations of IRP and IAP, we then introduce a one-parameter family of refined reliability measures, . Such measures characterize the consistency of the results of a dichotomous test in the absence of a gold standard as the threshold for a positive aggregate test result varies. Similar to IRP and IAP, we also derive corresponding accuracy estimates and rates of convergence for as the number k of test repetitions increases.
Supplementary Information:
The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00362-021-01266-9.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Test for Homogeneity
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests


