Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Lie for Me: Developmental Trends in Acquiescing to a Blatantly False Statement
Amelia Courtney Hritz1, Stephen J Ceci1
1Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Abstract:
A pair of studies demonstrates that simply asking children to make a blatantly false accusation in the guise of helping others can result in both immediate and long-term false claims. In the pilot study, the initial willingness to make a blatantly false statement was associated with some children making false statements a week later despite being told that the first interviewer had made mistakes during the initial interview. On a positive note, the majority of participants accurately stated that they did not have first-hand knowledge of their accusation's accuracy. Across both studies, the rate of false accusation rates was high. The main experiment demonstrated that children who were young, possessed the lowest verbal intelligence or who were from the lowest SES homes made the most accusations. These findings illustrate not only the dangers of encouraging children to make false statements, but the ease and durability of making such false statements.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Conformity
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

