Clinical evaluation of four amalgam alloys: a five-year report

In this study 96 teeth of 12 patients were restored with either the conventional alloy Premix, the blended non-gamma 2 amalgam Dispersalloy, or one of the spherical alloys Sybraloy and Tytin. To ascertain an objective comparison of the clinical performance of these alloys, two different alloys were used in each of at least two dental arch quadrants in the same patient and consequently were placed in the same oral environment. Clinical performance of the restorations was evaluated by macrophotography and scanning electron microphotography of replicas made after placement and 2, 3, and 5 years thereafter. Standard criteria were used for the evaluation of anatomic form, surface condition, and marginal adaptation of the fillings. In addition, the filling-enamel interface was assessed from the microphotographs. The three high-copper alloys performed better clinically than the conventional alloy, and the spherical alloys had the best qualifications. In addition to visual examination and photographic evaluation of restorations, the micrometric assessment of replica photographs from the scanning electron microscope may render clinical trials of amalgam alloys measurable and less subjective.