Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

04:10
Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
Published on: March 8, 2020
6.2K
Peak shifts and extinction under sex-specific selection
1Evolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Biology Letters
|October 12, 2021
Summary
Sexual selection and genetic correlation can drive evolutionary peak shifts. Macroevolution of sexual dimorphism depends on these factors, with sex-specific shifts aiding survival during extinction events.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Quantitative genetics
- Sexual selection
Background:
- Sexual selection and cross-sex genetic correlation (r_mf) can facilitate adaptive landscape peak shifts.
- Sexual antagonism can constrain these diversifying effects, influencing the macroevolution of sexual dimorphism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend quantitative genetic models to explore how sexual selection and r_mf interact with sexual antagonism.
- To investigate their combined effects on the macroevolution of sexual dimorphism.
Main Methods:
- Extension of existing quantitative genetic models.
- Analysis of evolution on complex adaptive landscapes.
- Inclusion of demographic factors and varying strengths of sexual selection and r_mf.
Main Results:
- Moderate to strong r_mf requires only weak sexual selection for a male-only peak shift.
- Stronger sexual selection leads to a sexually concordant peak shift.
- Sex-specific peak shifts are more resilient to extinction than concordant shifts, especially under strong natural selection.
Conclusions:
- Macroevolutionary rates of sexual dimorphism may be decoupled from within-population sexual selection strength.
- Within-population selection or constraint alone may not explain macroevolutionary patterns of sexual dimorphism.
- Demographic factors significantly influence the success of peak shifts in macroevolution.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
42.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
42.6K
Speciation Rates
21.8K
Overview
21.8K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
215
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
215
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.4K
Mate Choice
10.8K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
10.8K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
182
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
182

