Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

6.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
6.8K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

803
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
803
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.0K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Insights into perceptual learning.

eLife·2026
Same author

Training in Gabor Orientation Identification Optimizes the Temporal Window of Adults With Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

SSD: Targeting inflammasome and oxidative stress as a therapeutic strategy in inflammatory diseases.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects·2026
Same author

Volatile metabolomics reveals the regulation mechanisms of aroma formation in <i>Scutellaria baicalensis</i> Georgi herbal under different roasting methods.

Food chemistry: X·2026
Same author

Cepharanthine, a valuable sanative alternative for hepatocellular carcinoma through regulating Hippo-Yes-associated protein signal transduction.

Molecular pharmacology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.8K

Quantifying Uncertainty of the Estimated Visual Acuity Behavioral Function With Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling.

Yukai Zhao1, Luis Andres Lesmes2, Michael Dorr2

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Translational Vision Science & Technology
|October 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) to improve visual acuity (VA) testing accuracy. The HBM reduces uncertainty in VA measurements, enabling more precise detection of changes.

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

597
Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.8K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

597
Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Visual acuity (VA) testing is crucial for assessing vision.
  • Quantifying uncertainty in VA measurements is essential for accurate diagnosis and monitoring.
  • Existing methods may have limitations in precision, especially with limited data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) for enhanced uncertainty quantification in visual acuity (VA) tests.
  • To incorporate the relationship between VA threshold and range across individuals and tests.
  • To improve the precision of VA parameter estimation.

Main Methods:

  • A three-level hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) was developed using Gaussian distributions for population, individual, and test levels.
  • The HBM was applied to quantitative VA (qVA) data from 14 eyes across 4 Bangerter foil conditions.
  • Uncertainties of VA threshold and range were estimated and compared to traditional qVA methods.

Main Results:

  • The HBM demonstrated superior data fitting compared to qVA and recovered covariances between VA behavioral function (VABF) parameters.
  • Uncertainty in VA threshold and range estimates was reduced by 4.2% to 45.8%.
  • The HBM required fewer tested rows on average to achieve 95% accuracy in detecting VA changes.

Conclusions:

  • The HBM effectively leverages cross-individual and cross-test information for improved uncertainty quantification.
  • This model offers enhanced precision in VABF estimation, particularly beneficial with limited test data.
  • The HBM shows potential for increasing accuracy in detecting VA changes.