Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Stakeholder theory and management: Understanding longitudinal collaboration networks
Julian Fares1, Kon Shing Kenneth Chung2, Alireza Abbasi3
1Department of Management Studies, Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Research collaboration in stakeholder theory and management (STM) shows increasing density over time. Network centrality positively impacts author performance, guiding future research investments.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics and Scientometrics
- Social Network Analysis
- Stakeholder Theory and Management (STM)
Background:
- Understanding the evolution of research collaboration networks is crucial for scientific progress.
- The impact of co-authorship on research performance (productivity, citations) requires longitudinal analysis.
- Stakeholder Theory and Management (STM) as a discipline lacks comprehensive network evolution studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the evolution of research collaboration networks in STM from 1989-2020.
- To identify the longitudinal effect of co-authorship networks on research performance.
- To analyze network structures at author, institution, and country levels across different time periods.
Main Methods:
- Harvested 6,127 research articles from Web of Science Database (1989-2020).
- Transformed bibliometric data using Bibexcel.
- Applied social network analysis to map and compare collaboration networks across three sub-periods (t1: 1989-1999, t2: 2000-2010, t3: 2011-2020).
Main Results:
- Author collaboration networks remained fragmented but increased in clique size over time.
- Institutional networks showed less fragmentation and increased density.
- International collaboration evolved from fragmented to a dense, less fragmented network by t3.
- Positive association between author performance and centrality/structural holes in t3, contrasting with t1's ego-density/constraint/tie strength.
Conclusions:
- Research collaboration networks in STM are evolving towards greater density and interconnectedness.
- Network centrality and structural holes are key indicators of research performance in later periods.
- Findings inform policymakers and researchers on optimizing collaboration strategies and resource allocation.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Studies
Longitudinal Research
Social Exchange Theory
Relationship Formation
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances

