Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Are quality improvement plans perceived to improve the quality of primary care in Ontario? Qualitative study
Kim Tran1, Fiona Webster2, Noah M Ivers3
1First Nations, Inuit and Métis Lead for System Performance at the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer in Toronto, Ont.
Objective:
To explore primary care administrators' perceptions of provincially mandated quality improvement plans, and barriers to and facilitators of using quality improvement plans as tools for improving the quality of primary care.
Design:
Qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews.
Setting:
Ontario.
Participants:
Eleven primary care administrators (ie, executive directors, director of clinical services, office administrators) at 7 family health teams and 4 community health centres.
Methods:
All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed deductively to generate a framework based on a conceptual model of structural, organizational, individual, and innovation-related factors that influence the success of improvement initiatives and, inductively, to generate additional themes.
Main Findings:
Provincially mandated quality improvement plans seem to have raised awareness of and provided an overall focus on quality improvement, and have contributed to primary care organizations implementing initiatives to address quality gaps. Four factors that have contributed to the success of quality improvement plans relate to attributes of the quality improvement plans (adaptability and compatibility) and contextual factors (leadership and organizational culture). However, participants expressed that the use of quality improvement plans have not yet led to substantial improvements in the quality of primary care in Ontario, which may be owing to several challenges: poor data quality, lack of staff and physician engagement and buy-in, and lack of resources to support measurement and quality improvement.
Conclusion:
Awareness of and focused attention on the need for high-quality patient care may have increased, but participants expressed that substantial improvements in quality care have yet to be achieved in Ontario. The lack of perceived improvements is likely the result of multifaceted and complex challenges primary care organizations face when trying to improve patient care. To effect positive change, organization- and health system-level efforts are needed to improve measurement capabilities, improve staff and physician engagement, and increase capacity for quality improvement among organizations.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Patient-centered Care
Nursing Evaluation
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Planning Nursing Care I