Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
The ISCHEMIA trial: optimal medical therapy against PTCA in the stable patient: the endless story
Andrea Santucci1, Claudio Cavallini1
1Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria della Misericordia, Piazzale Menghini 1, 06129 Perugia, Italy.
Insights
For stable coronary artery disease, revascularization offers no survival benefit over optimal medical therapy alone. Recent studies confirm that invasive procedures do not improve prognosis in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary revascularization benefits acute coronary syndrome patients.
- Prognostic impact of revascularization in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains debated.
- Previous trials like COURAGE (2007) showed no significant benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic impact of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy in stable CAD.
- To assess if an invasive strategy improves outcomes compared to a non-invasive approach.
Main Methods:
- ISCHEMIA study (2020) compared selective coronary angiography and revascularization with a non-invasive strategy.
- Patients with >50% coronary stenosis underwent initial computed axial tomography angiography.
- Randomization to invasive (revascularization) or non-invasive (medical therapy, revascularization if destabilized) arms.
Main Results:
- ISCHEMIA did not show superiority of revascularization over medical therapy for the primary composite endpoint.
- The endpoint included cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or cardiac arrest.
- Similar to COURAGE, no significant prognostic improvement was observed with revascularization.
Conclusions:
- Coronary revascularization in stable CAD patients does not improve prognosis compared to optimal medical therapy alone.
- Current evidence supports medical management as the primary strategy for stable coronary artery disease.
- Invasive strategies are not superior for long-term outcomes in stable ischemic heart disease.
Abstract:
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, an aggressive approach with coronary angiography and revascularization leads to important benefits compared to medical therapy alone. On the contrary, the prognostic impact of coronary revascularization in patients suffering from stable coronary artery disease has long been the subject of debate. The pivotal study in this area is COURAGE, published in 2007, in which coronary revascularization showed no benefit about the combined endpoint of death from all causes and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), compared to medical therapy. The ISCHEMIA study, published in 2020, compared selective coronary angiography and revascularization vs. a non-invasive approach. By protocol, the patients were initially evaluated with coronary computed axial tomography angiography: in case of coronary stenosis >50%, they were then randomized to the two strategies. While in the invasive arm patients were revascularized, in the non-invasive arm revascularization was used only in case of patient destabilization. As in COURAGE, the results of ISCHEMIA did not demonstrate superiority of revascularization over medical therapy alone for a combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, AMI, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or cardiac arrest. Based on recent evidence from ISCHEMIA, it is therefore confirmed that coronary revascularization in stable patients does not seem to improve the prognosis compared to medical therapy alone.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies