Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Left atrial appendage closure with the watchman device reduces atrial fibrillation management costs
Giuseppe D Ancona1,2, Erdal Safak3,4, Denise Weber3,4
1Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Im Friedrichshain, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany. rgea@hotmail.com.
Insights
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) significantly reduces hospitalization costs for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The procedure becomes more cost-effective over time, influenced by patient risk profiles.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) poses significant healthcare cost burdens.
- Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF.
- Understanding the economic impact of LAAC is crucial for clinical and policy decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare hospitalization costs before and after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the Watchman device in non-valvular AF patients.
- To determine the factors influencing post-LAAC hospitalization costs and mortality.
- To assess the long-term economic profitability of LAAC.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs for 677 non-valvular AF patients undergoing LAAC between 2012 and 2016.
- Utilized the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) system to calculate pre- and post-procedural AF-related hospitalization costs.
- Statistical analysis including Cox-regression to identify determinants of costs and mortality.
Main Results:
- Median hospitalization costs decreased significantly from €17,867 pre-LAAC to €8,772 post-LAAC (p < 0.0001).
- Annualized costs also showed a significant reduction from €3,773 to €2,001 (p < 0.0001).
- LAAC costs achieved parity with pre-LAAC costs after 4.6 years of survival; CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores predicted post-LAAC costs. DRG mean clinical complexity level predicted mortality.
Conclusions:
- LAAC leads to substantial and sustained reductions in hospitalization costs for AF patients.
- The economic benefits of LAAC increase with patient survival time post-procedure.
- Patient risk profiles, indicated by CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and DRG CCL, are key determinants of costs and outcomes.
Aims:
To report hospitalization costs of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) submitted to percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device.
Methods:
Pre- and post-procedural hospitalization AF-related costs were calculated using the DRG system (diagnosis-related groups) and compared.
Results:
Between 2012 and 2016, 677 non-valvular AF patients underwent LAAC. Median time from first cardiac hospitalization to LAAC was 5.9 years (IQR 1.6-9.1) and median follow-up after LAAC was 4.8 years (IQR 3.6-5.6). LAAC mortality was 1.3% and follow-up mortality 16.9%. Median pre-LAAC hospitalization cost was € 17,867 (IQR € 7512-35,08) and post-LAAC € 8772 (IQR € 1183-25,159) (p < 0.0001). Annualized cost pre-LAAC was 3773 € (IQR € 1644-8,493) and post-LAAC 2,001 € (IQR € 260-6913) (p < 0.0001). Follow-up survivors had significantly lower post-LAAC costs (p < 0.0001) and after a survival cut-off time of 4.6 years LAAC procedural and post-procedural hospitalization costs achieved parity with pre-LACC costs (AUC 0.64; p = 0.02). CHA2DS2-VASc score (B = 0.04; p = 0.02; 95% CI 0.006-0.08), and HAS-BLED score (B = 0.08; p = 0.004; 95% CI 0.02-0.14) were independent determinants for annualized hospitalization costs post-LAAC. At Cox-regression analysis the DRG mean clinical complexity level (CCL) was the only independent determinant for follow-up mortality (OR = 2.2; p < 0.0001; 95% CI 1.6-2.8) with a cut-off value of 2.25 to predict follow-up mortality (AUC 0.72; p < 0.0001; Spec. 70%; Sens. 70%).
Conclusion:
Hospitalization costs pre-LAAC are consistent, and after LAAC, they are significantly reduced. Costs seem related to the patient's risk profile at the time of the procedure. With the increase in post-LAAC survival time, the procedure becomes economically more profitable.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

