Left atrial appendage closure with the watchman device reduces atrial fibrillation management costs

Giuseppe D Ancona1,2, Erdal Safak3,4, Denise Weber3,4

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Im Friedrichshain, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany. rgea@hotmail.com.

Insights

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) significantly reduces hospitalization costs for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The procedure becomes more cost-effective over time, influenced by patient risk profiles.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) poses significant healthcare cost burdens.
  • Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF.
  • Understanding the economic impact of LAAC is crucial for clinical and policy decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare hospitalization costs before and after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the Watchman device in non-valvular AF patients.
  • To determine the factors influencing post-LAAC hospitalization costs and mortality.
  • To assess the long-term economic profitability of LAAC.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs for 677 non-valvular AF patients undergoing LAAC between 2012 and 2016.
  • Utilized the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) system to calculate pre- and post-procedural AF-related hospitalization costs.
  • Statistical analysis including Cox-regression to identify determinants of costs and mortality.

Main Results:

  • Median hospitalization costs decreased significantly from €17,867 pre-LAAC to €8,772 post-LAAC (p < 0.0001).
  • Annualized costs also showed a significant reduction from €3,773 to €2,001 (p < 0.0001).
  • LAAC costs achieved parity with pre-LAAC costs after 4.6 years of survival; CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores predicted post-LAAC costs. DRG mean clinical complexity level predicted mortality.

Conclusions:

  • LAAC leads to substantial and sustained reductions in hospitalization costs for AF patients.
  • The economic benefits of LAAC increase with patient survival time post-procedure.
  • Patient risk profiles, indicated by CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and DRG CCL, are key determinants of costs and outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management01:26

Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

Mitral stenosis, a condition marked by the narrowing of the mitral valve, necessitates an integrated approach for effective management. This approach includes preventative measures, medical therapy, and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and prevent complications.PreventionPrevention of mitral stenosis primarily focuses on reducing the incidence of bacterial infections, particularly streptococcal infections, which can lead to rheumatic fever and subsequent valvular damage. Timely...
44
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is when the aortic valve does not close or seal properly, leading to backward blood circulation from the aorta into the left ventricle during diastole. Common causes of AR include rheumatic heart disease, congenital valve defects, and aortic root dilation. Managing AR requires a multifaceted approach to alleviate symptoms, preserve left ventricular function, and address the underlying cause of the regurgitation. Patients with symptomatic AR or significant left...
70
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is characterized by retrograde blood circulation from the left ventricle into the left atrium due to inadequate mitral valve closure. The severity of the condition, symptoms, and underlying cause determine treatment strategies.Monitoring and Pharmacological TreatmentPatients with mild to moderate MR typically do not need immediate intervention but regular monitoring to assess progression and guide treatment. Patients with mild MR should have an echocardiogram every 3-5...
52