A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants

Charlotte L Weeks1, Luise V Marino2, Mark J Johnson3

  • 1Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Insights

Feeding intolerance (FI) in preterm infants lacks a clear definition, impacting research and care. This review found a 27% prevalence of FI, with definitions varying widely and affecting outcomes like time to full enteral feeds.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Feeding intolerance (FI) is a common issue in preterm infants within neonatal intensive care units.
  • Existing research on feeding methods and comorbidities often focuses on FI, yet a universal definition is lacking.
  • This variability in definition complicates research and clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and analyze the diverse definitions of feeding intolerance (FI) used in studies involving preterm infants.
  • To estimate the prevalence of FI in preterm infants based on the definitions identified.
  • To explore how different definitions of FI impact the time to achieve full enteral feeding.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, NHS Evidence, Web of Science).
  • Inclusion criteria specified studies on preterm infants in neonatal units with a clear FI definition, involving more than 10 patients, and published in English.
  • Studies were categorized into groups based on the specific criteria used to define FI (e.g., gastric residual volume, abdominal distension, gastrointestinal symptoms).

Main Results:

  • One hundred studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing significant inconsistency in the definitions of FI.
  • Meta-analysis indicated a prevalence of FI ranging from 15% to 30% across different definition groups, with an overall prevalence of 27%.
  • The time to achieve full enteral feeds varied substantially (11.3-18.3 days) depending on the definition of FI employed.

Conclusions:

  • The definitions of feeding intolerance (FI) in research are highly inconsistent, mirroring issues found in pediatric and adult critical care.
  • The overlap in definitions, particularly concerning necrotizing enterocolitis, highlights the complexity of defining FI in preterm infants.
  • Further rigorous research is essential to establish a standardized definition of FI for this vulnerable population.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding01:15

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding

Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
345
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy01:30

Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy

Various diagnostic tests are employed in the diagnostic process for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), particularly to differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
451
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding01:26

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is appropriate for patients who cannot eat but still have a functioning digestive system. It is also beneficial for individuals with swallowing difficulties, anorexia, malabsorption, or those who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
554
Anatomy of the Intestines01:23

Anatomy of the Intestines

Although digestion of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids may begin in the stomach, it is completed in the intestine. The absorption of nutrients, water, and electrolytes from food and drink also occurs in the intestine. The intestines can be divided into two structurally distinct organs—the small and large intestines.
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
84.2K
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition01:27

Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) delivers essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system. It is commonly used for individuals with severe digestive disorders or conditions that prevent normal nutrient absorption.
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
354
Intellectual Disability01:29

Intellectual Disability

Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
214